Which of McGrain top 30 P4P wouldn't be elite in 2010s era?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by 70sFan865, Jul 13, 2019.


  1. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,574
    May 30, 2019
    Who do you think would struggle to dominate 2010s division(s) among the very best ever in terms of resume?

    Here is McGrain top 30 P4P list (which is outstanding BTW):

    01 - Sam Langford
    02 - Harry Greb
    03 - Sugar Ray Robinson
    04 - Henry Armstrong
    05 - Ezzard Charles
    06 - Bob Fitzsimmons
    07 - Muhammad Ali
    08 - Joe Gans
    09 - Joe Louis
    10 - Roberto Duran.
    11 - Benny Leonard
    12 - Mickey Walker
    13 - Willie Pep
    14 - Barney Ross
    15 - Archie Moore
    16 - Ray Leonard
    17 - George Dixon
    18 - Terry McGovern
    19 - Packey McFarland
    20 - Pernell Whitaker
    21 - Tony Canzoneri
    22 - Jimmy McLarnin
    23 - Sandy Saddler
    24 - Stanley Ketchel
    25 - Charley Burley
    26 - Holman Williams
    27 - Billy Conn
    28 - Gene Tunney
    29 - Roy Jones
    30 - Joe Walcott
     
  2. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,131
    44,900
    Mar 3, 2019
    All have a good chance, but the only one I'd pick to not be elite is George Dixon, just based on the fact his best wins came around 118

    But that's Inoue's domain
     
  3. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    16,250
    15,299
    Jun 9, 2007
    I dont know damn near anything about Dixon and only started reading tid bits about McGovern so far so that disqualifies me there.
    The only guy I may take issue with is Ketchel. Big Big power but does he have the ring craft to land it against the more mobile guys today??
     
    Tonto62 likes this.
  4. Tonto62

    Tonto62 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    5,040
    4,974
    Mar 26, 2011
    We are taking a lot on trust with the old timers so I'm going to go with Dixon.Maybe McGovern and Fitz.
     
    mrkoolkevin likes this.
  5. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    The sport has evolved and changed so much over the past 100+ years that I don’t see any reason to assume that even the most accomplished swashbucklers of the early years would dominate.
     
    Last edited: Jul 13, 2019
    Bukkake likes this.
  6. Bukkake

    Bukkake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,493
    3,718
    Apr 20, 2010
    For those who probably would be the most unlikely to dominate in this decade, I would pick:
    Fitz
    Dixon
    McFarland
    Ketchel
    Walcott
     
    mrkoolkevin likes this.
  7. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,131
    44,900
    Mar 3, 2019
    They'd make excellent fights, imagine

    Wallcott vs Porter (personally I'd see it as a missmatch but a great clash of styles)

    Fitzsimmons vs Canelo (another I'd say is a missmatch but a great fight)

    Ketchel vs GGG (oml this one would be incredible)

    McFarland vs Lomachenko would be a technical masterpiece

    And we could even have Ketchel vs Fitzsimmons
     
  8. The Undefeated Lachbuster

    The Undefeated Lachbuster On the Italian agenda Full Member

    4,899
    7,574
    Jul 18, 2018
    George Dixon HIGHKEY doesn't belong in the top 30 anyways
     
  9. ChrisJS

    ChrisJS Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,236
    7,118
    Sep 11, 2018
    No Porter fight could possibly be a great clash of styles. His style is awful. Watching him hurts the eyes more than accidentally rubbing your eyes after picking peppers.
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  10. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,131
    44,900
    Mar 3, 2019
    Neither does Roy Jones, Pernell Whitaker, Joe Walcott, Stanley Ketchel or Sandy Saddler imo but it's not are list

    And he belongs there more than Marciano does;)