Which of the Fab Four Can Manny Pacquiao and Floyd Mayweather Beat...???

Mayweather could beat Duran and Leonard. Hagler is too big. Pacquiao gets KOed by all of them. Way too sloppy and reckless.

 

None and none.

 

Apparently Lincoln was right, You can fool some of the people all of the time.

 

Prime for prime, None.

 

Floyd and Pac lose to ALL of them.
Floyd can beat the Duran from the Benitez fight, but prime Duran? LOL no.
I don't respect the opinion of anyone who thinks otherwise.

 

:deal

 

Agreed.

Duran beats Pac but what a fight that would be..

 

Floyd-Duran is a pretty good matchup, maybe Floyd-Hagler depending on how big Hagler really was (yes middleweight but back then fighters weren't really cutting as much)..

Edit: Actually nah, thinking some more prime for prime, none.

 

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/99/d9/e3/99d9e38a218855e9ba51e01fc3e31482.jpg

 

I don't think Manny or Floyd beats any of them.

The only version of the fab four that they beat is Duran in Duran/Leonard II.

 

prime for prime on a good day none. there is no chamce in hell either beats a well trained focused duran, the only chance is he shows up with no motivation. the other three are too big too consider. SRL is bigger, stronfer, just as fast and smart as Floyd. I wouldmt be surprised if one or two beat Pac by stoppage

 

Exactly, Duran can be the weakest of the four or the strongest depending on which Duran sjows up, but prime for prime they lose to all of them

 

The only boxer on that list that is close to the starting weight of Mayweather and Pacquiao is Roberto Duran. And Duran, many would say, is the best lightweight of all time. Period. So to say they can't beat Duran doesn't mean **** basically. "Oh no, we think Roberto Duran would beat them head to head." Ok... and? Who else beats Roberto at 135? Nobody. That's not exactly a negative when you have to conjure up the name of Roberto Duran as a hypothetical match-up that they lose.

Hagler? Really? Yea, a guy who fought at Middleweight his entire career against a couple of guys that started at Featherweight and below as teenagers. Tough call........ I'll go with the guy that started 6 weight classes higher than the other two.

Hearns and Leonard both started their career at 147, and are among the best ever to begin their career at welter. Just like Hagler, to claim they would beat boxers, even ATG boxers, that started several weight classes below them is hardly an intriguing argument. It's a "no **** Sherlock" statement.

The answer is none of them to put it bluntly. But the question to begin with is kind of ridiculous.

 

They both go 0 for 4. No insult, just the wrong size for them.