Which of the following fighters are "SuperHeavyWeight?"

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by reznick, Mar 1, 2019.


Which of these fighters are Super Heavyweights?

  1. Deontay Wilder (Fury Fight 209lb)

    22.2%
  2. Mike Tyson (Ruddock Fight 216lb)

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. Joe Louis (Charles Fight 218lb)

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. Jack Johnson (Willard Fight 225lb)

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  5. Lennox Lewis (Bruno Fight 229lb)

    88.9%
  6. John L Sullivan (Burke Fight 238lb)

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  7. Jim Jeffries (Finnegan Fight 240lb)

    3.7%
  8. Anthony Joshua (Klitschko Fight 250lb)

    96.3%
  9. Primo Carnera (Erickson Fight 284lb)

    85.2%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    Your choice. You decide.
     
  2. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    None seeing as though there isn't a SHW division in the pro ranks.
     
    scribbs, KO KIDD, Seamus and 3 others like this.
  3. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,754
    44,317
    Apr 27, 2005
    Under the general gist of the convo Lewis, Joshua and Carnera.
     
  4. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,722
    29,070
    Jun 2, 2006
    The problem with this agenda driven thread is you are carefully selecting isolated fights to further your said agenda.
    You picked Louis when he was coming back after being retired for over two years and was in his mid 30's.
    Johnson when he was 37 .
    Jeffries when he hadn't trained seriously for a joke of a fight that he knew was going to be a blow out.
    Same with a fat Sullivan.
    Then, to further your argument you selected a version of Lewis that isn't at all representative af him in his prime.
    It's not only disingenuous,it's rather silly ,and pointless really.
    Wilder at 6'7" and often more than ten lbs over that weight is a SHVY,so are Lewis ,Joshua , and Carnera.I feel it's a combination of both height,reach, and weight.Others may have a slightly different criteria, or in your case an agenda.
     
    Last edited: Mar 2, 2019
  5. Entaowed

    Entaowed Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,837
    4,174
    Dec 16, 2012
    This reply is very sensible.

    You should know that SHW, an informal designation anyway, does not depend only upon weight.
    Especially when a fighter is overweight or over their prime weight.
    And overall size, height, bone structure, wingspan, are strong factors.
    You also got Wilder's weight wrong in that fights-he was 212 & 1/2.
    Even if your others are all accurate, clearly natural size & significant muscle weight on a large skeleton are the main criteria.
     
  6. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,584
    11,099
    Oct 28, 2017
    I think it has to be done off of an estimated leanweight, not just getting fat.
     
    mcvey likes this.
  7. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    My only agenda here is to help clarify the definition of the term Super Heavyweight. It seems to be used pretty loosely depending on certain arguments being made. If you’re confident in your understanding of the term, shouldn’t you be able to discuss the free flow of ideas without accusing one of having an agenda who constitutes as one?

    So to better understand your post, being a SHW is either natural to a fighter or it isn’t?

    Would you consider the 250lb version of Toney to be a SHW?

    Also, would you consider the 200lb version of Langford to be a HW?

    Yes, choosing isolated fights for the purpose of this thread is intentional. And serves to explore in more detail the definition of SHW given fighters with fluctuating weights throughout their careers.

    Any effort to block such discussions to me signals fear and safeguarding of unsubstantiated agendas.
     
    Last edited: Mar 2, 2019
  8. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    How would you define natural size?
    What would you consider Lennox Lewis’s natural size?
     
  9. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    Herein lies one of the issues with the classification of SHW commonly used.

    You have to remember that there was a consensus being pushed here for about a decade, that the HW division has evolved to the point that there will never be another elite HW champion under 220lb ever again. There were very passionate arguments being made on this subject.
     
    The Senator and Unforgiven like this.
  10. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,754
    44,317
    Apr 27, 2005
    I totally agree. Many of the people pushing this line got caught out stipulating poundage minimums for guys that could compete in the current climate e.g. guys under x pounds will no longer be relevant etc. Wilder has come along and made a mockery of that so they have reverted to height and reach without missing a beat. You can't have it both ways.
     
    The Senator and Unforgiven like this.
  11. The Undefeated Lachbuster

    The Undefeated Lachbuster On the Italian agenda Full Member

    4,899
    7,574
    Jul 18, 2018
    I'll give you the main problem

    Super heavyweight doesn't exist

    Heavyweights are Heavyweights, stop trying to act like the slightly larger ones have evolved beyond human capabilities
     
  12. The Undefeated Lachbuster

    The Undefeated Lachbuster On the Italian agenda Full Member

    4,899
    7,574
    Jul 18, 2018
    After Primo Carnera killed Earnie Schaaf in the ring, there was a legitimate call for a "Juggernaut" division for him and all of the SHWs like Buddy Baer and Abe Simon and the like
     
    roughdiamond and Unforgiven like this.
  13. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,722
    29,070
    Jun 2, 2006
    I've no wish to block any discussion on this topic.TBH it doesn't even interest me that much.
    To address your other points.
    No, I wouldn't consider Toney to be a SPHVY ,I would classify him as a lazy ,but gifted middleweight who had some success at higher weights because of his natural ability.
    Langford I would consider to be a fat version of the great fighter that he undoubtedly was.
    His best weight was around 175lbs.
    You know precisely what you are doing and why you are doing it.
    Give some of us credit for seeing it coming a mile off!
    Because we have!
     
    Seamus likes this.
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,722
    29,070
    Jun 2, 2006
    1.Carnera did not kill Schaaf in the ring.
    2.Schaaf had no business being in a ring he was still getting over a particularly virulent case of influenza,plus the punishment that Baer had inflicted in the closing stages of their fight is thought to have been the reason he was a "dead man walking."

    Buddy Baer and Abe Simon were not on the radar in1933 when Carnera fought Schaaf,they weren't contenders until1942, 9 years later!
     
    Last edited: Mar 2, 2019
  15. The Undefeated Lachbuster

    The Undefeated Lachbuster On the Italian agenda Full Member

    4,899
    7,574
    Jul 18, 2018
    I was just thinking off the top of my head "good SHWs from Louis' era"

    Uh I guess Ray Impelletiere and Victorious Campolo, I think they were relevant in the esrly-mid 30s