Which of the four major sanctioning bodies is the $h*ttiest?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Slothrop, Sep 25, 2012.


  1. Slothrop

    Slothrop Boxing Junkie banned

    11,540
    2
    Nov 25, 2004
    Article on the front page about a fighter being awarded the highly coveted "green belt" inspired the thread....
     
  2. oibighead

    oibighead G.O.A.T. Full Member

    12,724
    4
    Jan 1, 2010
    Wba
    wbc
    ibf
    wbo



    Shittest first
     
  3. rorschach51

    rorschach51 A Legend & A Gentleman Full Member

    12,195
    8,406
    Feb 18, 2012
    The worst organization imo is the WBC by a landslide.
     
  4. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,133
    10,551
    Jul 28, 2009
    It's the WBA or the WBC. But it's like asking if it's worse to be deaf, mute, blind or paralyzed. Even the best option is bad.
     
  5. stillth3sameg

    stillth3sameg Woolly Rhino Full Member

    1,896
    0
    Sep 16, 2009
    shittiest in terms of what? because the wbc definitely is one of the more coveted belts
     
  6. megavolt

    megavolt Constantly Shadowboxing Full Member

    13,622
    34
    Dec 25, 2009
    The only debate here is whether the WBA is worse than the WBC because of the sheer amount of belts per division, but WBC is right there with it AND corrupt as ****
     
  7. bmf95b

    bmf95b Boxing Fan Full Member

    5,268
    11
    Jan 9, 2007
    WBC writes and changes rules as they wish
    WBA has to many champs
     
  8. tottenham19

    tottenham19 ESB Masterbro Full Member

    1,809
    0
    Jul 28, 2010
    1. WBA
    2. WBO
    3. WBC
    4. IBF

    You could really rank the WBA, WBO and WBC in any order. WBA has too many paper championships and rarely enforces mandatories for certain challenegrs - Povetkin, Sturm, John. WBO strips its less profitable fighters on a whim with little reason. In addition the WBO have some serious paper champs. The WBC is just flat-out corrupt and biased towards Mexicans, along with its new rule for not allowing unifications.IBF not that bad: only shitty thing they did recently was not strip drug cheat Lamont Peterson. They tried to set up a decent tourny for a shot at Wladimir. They seem to encourage unifications.
     
  9. The Mangler

    The Mangler Active Member Full Member

    788
    0
    Aug 16, 2012
    I agree with this list.

    WBA has their stupid super and regular ****.

    WBC has their silver and diamond ****.

    IBF has always been quickest to strip ppl, tho lately WBC is takin up that cause more often.

    WBO only been serious for about 10 yrs, but they actually ain't that bad.
     
  10. tottenham19

    tottenham19 ESB Masterbro Full Member

    1,809
    0
    Jul 28, 2010
    WBO strips people quicker than IBF. They also have Nathan Cleverly as a champion.:rofl
     
  11. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    by far the WBC and the WBA. it's not even close.
     
  12. haworths623

    haworths623 Guest

    They are all ****ing awful. The WBC is extremely corrupt, didn't Lou Dibella go ****ing mental because the president of the WBC had a bet of Chavez Jr winning against Lee?

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0qdnrJGaHgo[/ame]
     
  13. KidDynamite

    KidDynamite Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,857
    1,513
    Sep 16, 2012
    IBF is a joke as well

    Peterson retains that belt even after testing positive for PEDs (testosterone)
     
  14. tottenham19

    tottenham19 ESB Masterbro Full Member

    1,809
    0
    Jul 28, 2010
    Bet was for dinner. Sulaiman picked Chavez against Martinez.
     
  15. Atlanta

    Atlanta Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,688
    6
    Dec 26, 2009
    WBA
    WBO
    WBC













    IBF
    IBO

    Shitiest ranked first