Which of The Ring's top 10 Super Middleweights do you think Martin Murray could beat?

Who's he knocked out that suggests he could knock out a guy that went 11 rounds with GGG. He didn't hurt DeGale once.

 

National bias? You are the one stating it's a mismatch. Take out Froch, DeGale (who he lost too) and (Abe although he's not on a higher level than GGG's opponents)- and all you have is garbage.

So as it stands Martin Murray would be Andre Dirrell's best win by a mile

And I'll have you know I'm one of the few on this forum that can seprate the hype job from the real deal.

Who after 3 fights picked Inoue for greatest (while at the same time stating Broner is the biggest hype job in boxing)....that'd be me.

 

No he didn't beat Froch clear as day. That's your national basis again. I noticed you've done a thread begging for a DeGale-Dirrell rematch, when DeGale clearly won, and Dirrell only got in the fight because DeGale let him rather than he fought his way back in.

You need to move on when Dirrell gets beat and admit he's overrated to begin with.

Who is better than Abe (who may well have KO'd Dirrell anyway before his shameful quit job). That'd be Martin Murray. Who would be highly competitive with Dirrell

 

:yep

 

I didn't say at Middleweight. I said Murray is better than Abe now.

Saying Murray would not be competitive with Dirrell is the only laughable thing in this conversation. Fun fact. Dirrell has never even defeated a B level fighter without a quit job DQ. And no, he didn't deserve anything against Froch. Running is not ring generalship.

But Murray in a fair world would have Martinez and maybe Strum on his resume and been beaten once by Golovkin.

 

MVC! did say he'd KO James DeGale

 

He did say Broner gives prime Leonard, Duran, Mayweather, Pacquiao and Mosley fits at Lightweight bless his little cotton socks