Which of these 2 heavyweights have the better RESUME??

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by ChrisPontius, Oct 29, 2007.


  1. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    275
    Oct 4, 2005
    Fighter A has:
    Fought a fat, 37 year old extremely experienced ring veteran James Toney twice. The first fights was a very close one that could go both way; many thuoght fighter A was lucky to get the verdict and an immediate rematch was set in which he dominated Toney.

    After that he fights a 37 year old McCline who has been a bit of an underachiever but seems to have lacked that burning desire throughout his career. McCline put fighter A three times on his ass early on and nearly stopped him, but still managed to lose the fight.

    Fighter B has:
    Fought a 40 year old ring veteran Larry Donald. Donald recently beat an aging Holyfield very convincingly (yet before he had his somewhat impressive comeback) and he lost a very controversial split decision to Valuev, almost everyone had Donald winning. Fighter B dominated Donald and didn't lose a single round in the process.

    After that he fought another old but experienced, unorthodox fighter in Chris Byrd. Byrd was the longest reigning champion untill he ran into the best fighter in the division last year. Byrd was beaten thoroughly, managed to win only a couple of rounds.


    Let's say they only fought tomato cans outside of that, who has the better resume?
     
  2. avk47

    avk47 King Full Member

    2,120
    0
    Feb 3, 2005
    :lol: You forgot that Peter fought Wlad.. but based on what you mentioned - Povetkin sounds beter.
     
  3. Shpion

    Shpion IDF Full Member

    2,678
    1
    Feb 9, 2007
    Fought and lost.

    Povetkin(in his 13th and 14th pro fights) beet Donald and Byrd who are better than McCline and Toney in an impressive fashion, rather than Peter strugling with McCline and Toney (in his 28th and 30th pro fights).
     
  4. Ambition_Def

    Ambition_Def **** the people. Full Member

    8,161
    3
    Feb 4, 2006
    Sam Peter clearly is more distinguished as a professional.

    When Povetkin actually steps in the ring with the consensus #1, as well as faring somewhat fine, then we can make this argument. As it is, even in a loss, Samuel Peter is more proven than Povetkin.

    Don't forget who Byrd is at 37 years old. If you like, you can compare him to an old James Toney. But no more than that. He was not champion when Povetkin beat him, nor was he really in a state of being able to recapture a title. Part of my prediction in that fight was based on how much Byrd has deteriorated over the years.
     
  5. Shpion

    Shpion IDF Full Member

    2,678
    1
    Feb 9, 2007
    I understand your alliance to Peter but facts are facts.

    Byrd at 37 being a 2 times ex HW champion is 10 times better than McCline at 37 (never achieved anything in HW) and Toney 39 (never achieved anything in HW) taken together.
     
  6. Ambition_Def

    Ambition_Def **** the people. Full Member

    8,161
    3
    Feb 4, 2006

    I don't dislike Povetkin but you I do. You have absolutely no objectivity when it comes to Eastern European boxers. I outlined clearly in my post that Sam Peter's experience with Waldo is far more proof that he belongs in the top 5 than Povetkin's questionmark at that level. But you will never get that. As proof of your direct reply to my quote.
     
  7. razor

    razor Ali hater Full Member

    582
    0
    Jul 27, 2004
    LOL.
    You know we do.
    And he was much better, the #1 before Klitschko beat him. Remember?
     
  8. Ambition_Def

    Ambition_Def **** the people. Full Member

    8,161
    3
    Feb 4, 2006
    He was also the guy who barely beat McCline and Golota and Oquendo.

    Don't forget that.
     
  9. Ambition_Def

    Ambition_Def **** the people. Full Member

    8,161
    3
    Feb 4, 2006
    Good and objective post Cal. And I echo your final statement.

    Should Povetkin get by Brock/Chambers and even in a losing effort give Waldo a close fight, he will rightfully be up there with the top 5. If not right inside of it. If he goes all the way and beats Waldo, well then we have a new #1.
     
  10. Shpion

    Shpion IDF Full Member

    2,678
    1
    Feb 9, 2007
    I don't like you either but I am trying to maintain a dialoge here about the topic. I may be biased towards certain E. European fighters, I agree. You on the other hand hate on each and every one of them. But this is not about you and me. This is about the fighters: Peter and Povetkin and who they beat and how in their respective carrers. Even though Peter was much more successfull than most in his fight with Waldo he still got completely outboxed but that is still not the point. The point is that Povetkin in his only 14 pro-fights beat a better competition in an impressive manner than Peter in 30 fights.
     
  11. geppy

    geppy Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,788
    0
    Jul 19, 2004
    I think the resumes are even, but fighters A's KO wins over Yanqui " The Canvass Sweeper " Diaz, Jeremy "half-man/half-glass" Williams, Juluis " The Falling Oak " Long, ," Little" Gil " should of stayed at 160 lbs , fatass Martinez " are more impressive. Fighter A with quality knock outs over over such opposition, has proven devastating punching power!
     
  12. Shpion

    Shpion IDF Full Member

    2,678
    1
    Feb 9, 2007
    And how is 39 y.o Toney that in opinions of many lost to Batchelder better than Byrd, or McCline that lost to Zuri Lawrence few fights ago better than Donald???
     
  13. Ambition_Def

    Ambition_Def **** the people. Full Member

    8,161
    3
    Feb 4, 2006
    First off you lie. I do not hate all of them. I have alot of respect for most of them except the ones which show shady professionalism in and out of the ring. I also hold Povetkin in high regard, BUT objectively as I do with any of the heavyweights today.

    Saying that Povetkin should be higher ranked than Peter is ******ed. And only a true Klitco fanatic would support that sentiment. Byrd as most outlined, presented no problem for Povetkin. I picked him 8-4, and some others predicted TKO and late stoppage. Of course, I guess I gave Byrd more credit than they did. Cal also laid out how Donald was coming off a huge layoff, whereas Sam Peter took McCline on very short notice (who else has done that?).

    You need to ask yourself how objective you are being. Because you clearly aren't in my eyes.
     
  14. Kostya Zoo

    Kostya Zoo Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,803
    0
    Feb 6, 2006

    I've been saying this for a long time. Sam Peter is the result of effective marketing. His mystical power is smoke and mirrors. He never did jack **** to deserve his eliminator against Klitschko or his subsequent eliminator against Toney.

    Povetkin's fights before a title eliminator: Donald and Byrd
    Peter's fights before a title eliminator: Taurus Sykes and Gilbert Martinez

    Pure hype.


    PS - Maskaev will beat him.
     
  15. Shpion

    Shpion IDF Full Member

    2,678
    1
    Feb 9, 2007
    You are calling me a liar? I could pull out your racists posts from no too long ago about E. European fighters that you respect so much.

    So I am a Klitco fanatic:lol: :lol: ? Which one of them??

    So you view McCline as the better fighter than Donald ha? That is totaly objective.

    I would like to conclude that while Peter is the more experienced and achieved fighter (based in win/loss experience and the interim title that was handed to him) in the HW division, Povetkin did beat the better fighters and did it decisevely.