Which of these fighters does Jack Johnson have the best chance to beat

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by KuRuPT, Jun 26, 2019.


  1. The Undefeated Lachbuster

    The Undefeated Lachbuster On the Italian agenda Full Member

    4,899
    7,574
    Jul 18, 2018
    Exaggeration, obviously

    Marciano was strong though, so was Johnson. Top percentage of strength in boxing methinks
     
  2. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    Sure, but I guess I wondered what was supposedly so extraordinary about his strength and how it manifested itself.

    I don’t really have an opinion, and I think that the importance of “strength” gets overrated in a lot of these discussions, but I’m just curious.
     
  3. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    29,578
    36,141
    Jan 8, 2017
    Norton and Tunney he beats . Loses to the rest .
     
  4. The Undefeated Lachbuster

    The Undefeated Lachbuster On the Italian agenda Full Member

    4,899
    7,574
    Jul 18, 2018
    I agree that the importance of strength is overvalued in boxing, but in this fight specifically there'd be more grappling than usual so it comes to importance

    Marciano has been described as surprisingly strong by multiple of his opponents. Marciano was also a talented wrestler and they usually tend to be strong due to the weight training and grappling they do
     
  5. Rainer

    Rainer Active Member Full Member

    883
    623
    May 2, 2019
    Its very possible,we just don't know how era's styles will translate when plucked out of their own time ,do we.
     
    Fergy likes this.
  6. Jackomano

    Jackomano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,268
    7,011
    Nov 22, 2014
    A prime Johnson would most likely beat everybody on the list if they were fighting under the rules of his day.
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  7. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    29,578
    36,141
    Jan 8, 2017
    That's exactly it !
    Way I look at it is , let's say AJ was of this time still but Ruiz Jr was around in the 1980s or 70s . Now people talking about matching up AJ from guys from the past , someone mention s Andy Ruiz ,how would he do against Joshua . Most people s thought s would be to laugh ,ahh AJ would destroy the fat short ass !
    But of course as we know ,AJs style , skill set etc did nothing for him whatsoever .
    And it's same with putting guys from different era s together ,on paper one might look so much better than the other but actually face to face ?Who know s ?
     
    Rainer likes this.
  8. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,352
    11,385
    Jan 6, 2007
    I think he would be favoured over Dempsey and Tunney, underdog v Marciano and Louis, and a 50/50 v Norton.
     
  9. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    Rocky didn’t fight teenagers as a pro. Johnson’s win over an 18 or19 year old Mcvey needs to be put into context.

    Skill wise Rocky was well ahead of Mcvey

    Johnson didn’t hit hard enough here nor did he have the chin. Ross who didn’t deserve a title shot hurt Johnson with the only solid blow he landed. Ketchel landed two good ones. One left a mark, the other floored and hurt Johnson.

    How is Johnson taking Rocky’s punch? IMO not well and the two above fights show crude men could land and hurt Johnson.
     
  10. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,584
    11,099
    Oct 28, 2017
    Has McVea's age ever actually been verified?

    If he was that young, he must've matured fast, and he had a good win over Denver Ed Martin
     
  11. louis54

    louis54 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,187
    1,302
    Mar 20, 2013
    Johnson might have beaten all of them thats how great he was....i think he beats marciano, tunney, and Norton but not louis or dempsey
     
  12. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,574
    May 30, 2019
    From 1901 (Choynski) to 1915 (Willard) he was knocked out zero times.He fought almost 70 times in that span. Either he had great chin, or was untouchable in his prime. It's not like he didn't face good hitters either.
     
    BitPlayerVesti, louis54 and Rainer like this.
  13. louis54

    louis54 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,187
    1,302
    Mar 20, 2013
    Very good post....yes nobody is koing johnson save maybe louis or dempsey
     
  14. Rainer

    Rainer Active Member Full Member

    883
    623
    May 2, 2019
    I can't reconcile him having a weak chin with surviving without being ko'd for all those years either, that's 14 years!
    I also take issue that he didn't hit hard enough,to be sure he wasn't a Louis/Dempsey type puncher,but he hit pretty hard imo.
    Hard enough top stop McVey in15rds and floor him several times in their other two fights.
    Hard enough to floor Jeannette multiple times in their series.Hard enough to floor Gardner,Ross,Langford,Butler,Lang,Flynn,Burns,Martin Klondyke,and ko Ketchel for several minutes.
    As we know Johnson rarely went for the ko, but to suggest he was deficient in hitting power is, I think wide of the mark.
    I'm not convinced Marciano was more skilled than McVey either.Reports of one of the Langford v McVey fights state McVey jabbed Langford at will,did Rocky ever show skill with the jab? We can't be too dogmatic on these dream matches, it's hard enough predicting how a heavyweight fight will turn out between to current guys, let alone two across many decades!
     
  15. Greb & Papke 707

    Greb & Papke 707 Active Member Full Member

    649
    639
    Apr 9, 2019
    I honestly don’t think he can beat any of them, but i think his best chances are against Louis and Tunney, his blocking with his hands style of defense could mess with Tunney and he figured out joe Louis weakness without fighting him, those two imo he has a chance against, the swarmers Dempsey and Rocky would be to busy and hit to hard for him and Norton is to big and strong and has proven himself to be very good against “pure boxers” assuming of course that Johnson falls into that category . All decent fights but I honestly don’t think Johnson is beating too many heavyweight champions or challengers post his own era , this of course, could be my own bias as I’ve stated repeatedly on this forum that I feel Johnson is wildly overrated