Which of these three has the weakest resume: MOSLEY, MAYWEATHER, CALZAGHE?

The thread title and poll quite clearly indicates what the discussion is about.
Anonymity gives people the opportunity to exhibit the very worst of themselves. And your continual use of insults to try and prove your point shows me no matter how well written your posts are you are both childish and not worth my time.

 

Calzaghe. The guy is an opportunist. He waited until he was sure Roy was done to fight him. He fought Hopkins at 43. He actually beat Jeff Lacy and Kessler but the ref didn't want to count when Mitchell dropped him. He stopped when Byron hit the mat. I'm not saying Mitchell would've won but did you actually see the fight? Who else did he fight? Shieka?

 

Mosley.

 

Well OK call Kessler "champ" then, I think he is elite he's never lost a round unanimously to anyone other than Calzaghe. In terms of giving him too much credit, I give him the same amount of credit I give the other two, anyone who held a big 4 belt is listed under "champs". Some are stronger than others on all 3 resumes, but you have to be consistent.

 

strongest to weakest
Pbf
Ssm
Jc

 

Calzaghe by lightyears.

 

Mosley the best resume in terms of whom he fought. Mayweather has the best resume in terms of whom he beat (even though Mosley's best win, over DLH in 2000, is better than PBF's best win, because Mosley's resume of wins is thin after that).

Calzaghe has the weakest resume of the 3.

 

1) Mayweather
2) Calzaghe
3) Mosley

 

Altough all 3 have their issues with their career, Joe Calzaghe clearly has the weakest resume compared to Shane and Floyd. Or put it another way: Calzaghe has a pretty good resume, and Mosley and Mayweather have an even better one.

 

the resume with the weakest oppostion = calzaghe

 

1. Mosley
2. Calzaghe

 

Calzaghe.