Which of these three would you take to KO Joshua if your life depended on it?

1. Jermaine Franklin (part time factory worker, didn’t stop Pavel Sour over the full 10 rounds, who was smoked in 3 by Hughie, in 2 by Gorman and in 1 by Kabayel)

2. Carlos Takam (didn’t drop or stop any of his 10 best opponents, including Yoka and Forrest and didn’t drop or stop MMA journeyman Maldonado over the 10 round distance under boxing rules)

3. Francis Ngannou (GOAT UFC HW KO artist)

 

Joshua beat Takam and Franklin with ease and i cant ever see either of them knocking Joshua out. Ngannou is awful. You will see that on Saturday when Tyson beats him with ease. I guess i would die as out of them 3 none of them are knocking Joshua out.

 

Sure Ngannou is awful, has virtually no chance. But neither would Andy Ruiz vs Fury, he wouldn't land a glove in Fury's head just as Whyte didn't over 6 rounds before getting one-punched, Whyte being Joshua's 3rd best win.

You can't say "Franklin" or "Takam" because you know Ngannou probably has a better chance of beating Joshua based on being a 6'4, 270 lbs wild puncher, regardless of his lack of pure boxing experience.

 

What has Ruiz got to do with any of this lol. Listen I'm not like the rest of these people on this forum, I'm a fan of both Fury and Joshua. I've supported both throughout there career. I find the whole Joshua/Fury, Matchroom/Queensbury etc fanboys weird.

This thread is stupid. Like i said, Joshua had already comfortably beat Takam and Franklin and to be honest i really believe he would beat Ngannou with one hand behind his back.

 

What he's got to do with it is you claimed Ngannou is awful and your evidence is that Fury will beat him with ease. But Fury beats pro boxers with ease, such as AJ's 3rd best win Whyte who never landed a significant headshot on Fury before being one-punched in 6. And Fury would beat the Mexican guy who demolished Joshua in similar one-sided fashion. So Fury dominating Ngannou doesn't mean Ngannou wouldn't have a better chance of beating Joshua than the likes of Franklin and Takam, logically speaking.

You don't really believe that Joshua could beat Ngannou with one hand tied behind his back, stop with the hyperbole. Joshua would get massacred with such a debilitation.

The thread is great because it exposes the laughably lopsided nature of many "title defences" and this applies to all eras.

 

Maybe it's because its a Monday and been a long day at work but you sound like a mad man. I don't know what you going on about.