Which one of these past champions would have the hardest time today?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Mendoza, Nov 24, 2008.


  1. Rattler

    Rattler Middle Aged Man Full Member

    3,925
    21
    Feb 9, 2005
    He was also a guy who was easy to tag with his style. If he fought a more lateral movement style, then it'd be different, but walking right in makes him a punching bag; a skilled one, but nonetheless.
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,818
    51,886
    Mar 21, 2007
    Rocky looks exactly what a fighter should look like:
    This content is protected



    I'm not convinced Rocky would fail against the "modern superheavyweights" at all:
    This content is protected


    And I mean the 180lb version.
     
  3. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,973
    13,342
    Apr 1, 2007
    Tyson was extremely subtle with his elbowing, Holyfield was even more sneaky and adapt with his head, hence why he got away with it for decades.

    Marciano... Crude. Violent. Not too terribly subtle. He elbowed, hit below the belt, and could headbutt himself. Neither of the above did all three on a regular basis.

    If there wasn't a very lenient ref and the order to let the fight get rough in Rocky's interest, I think he'd get DQ'ed here and there.
     
  4. Bigcat

    Bigcat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,545
    101
    Jan 10, 2006
    Johnson would have a massive problem getting fights.. Everyone would just get the DVD , see what he brings, and say NO THANKYOU.. he is the Number 1 member of the who needs em club...............

    He would be like a needle in a haystack...... Hard to find..
     
  5. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,214
    27,708
    Jan 3, 2007
    I will go with the concencus and pick Johnson to be the most handicapped in a modern era.

    Joe Frazier and Marciano, both possesed styles and workrate levels, that would at least give them a good chance against superheavyweights. Johnson's main asset was his size over smaller opponents, which would be virtually moot in today's heavyweight division. In fact, he'd be facing men who would literally dwarf him, and were arguably stronger. His holding techniques, in an effort to wear down his opponents, would not only be to no avail, but would likely work against him. Lastly, as already mentioned, the rules of his era were too dissimilar to those of today.
     
  6. Bad_Intentions

    Bad_Intentions Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,367
    31
    May 15, 2007
  7. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,583
    Jul 28, 2004
    Thank you. I've pointed this out in past threads, that all things being equal in these hypothetical matchups that why shouldn't the greats of the past also have access to modern advantages in training and fighting techniques as well? An Emanuel Steward training Max Schmeling and tweaking his style and giving him extra added strategies to impart to his game, for example. It swings both ways in these mythical, "what-if" bouts of the imagination that we indulge in.
     
  8. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,214
    27,708
    Jan 3, 2007
    The obvious answer is, because now you're no longer talking about " the greats of the past, " but rather something that you're trying to morph them into, making hypothetical matches meaningless.
     
  9. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,997
    28,008
    Feb 15, 2006
    I am confident that any of them could clean house today.
     
  10. jodan

    jodan New Member Full Member

    62
    0
    Sep 2, 2008
    Not one of them would find it difficult, those guys had more heart in there little finger than what the whole division has today. Anyone who thinks otherwise is a numpty.

    Mind you imagine Jack Johnson fighting Wlad Klitschko that would be the most boring fight in history (yes even worse than Wlad klitschko's last turn out)
     
  11. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,246
    5,933
    Apr 30, 2006
    If they sought out FDA approval, they could easily market DVD's of that fight as the safest, most effective cure for insomnia imaginable.
     
  12. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    100
    Aug 21, 2008
    Johnson IMO.

    He relied largely on the fact that he was bigger than most of the heavies of his era and had somewhat "ahead of his time" skills.

    Marciano would have the easiest time IMO because he'd be fighting in the cruiserweight division, and a rather indistinguished one at that.
     
  13. JIm Broughton

    JIm Broughton Active Member Full Member

    772
    22
    Feb 24, 2007
    If we're talking 2008 then none of them. The HW division is in a sorry state. I recently watched a rerun of the Peter/Toney fight and was disgusted at what I saw. Two overweight slobs who threw pittypat punches at each other all night and were exhausted doing it as well. If we're talking about the 70's/early 80's then I think all of them would have a hard time due to the quality of HW's from that era(except Frazier of course...I'm talking about Johnson and Marciano). Be that as it may, if we could take all three and time travel them to today then I would have to pick Johnson from a stylistic perspective. He certainly had the size and strength to cope even though he would'nt be a big heavy today but the way he fought would be problematic against a big skilled man with a good jab aka Lewis or Vlad. Leaning back like Jack did might make it a little difficult to reach him but it would be even more difficult for Jack to reach them as well. Frazier and Marciano would find it easier with thier ducking and crouching to get underneath and come up punching whereas Jack is going to have to reach to try and catch a fighter like Lewis or Vlad. Even though Jack is bigger than both Frazier and Marciano, his style(Leaning back with chin exposed) might give him problems against a skilled big man even with his good reflexes. Boxing was alot different in Jack's day than today. Little jabbing and alot of holding. In the HW division back then it was a waiting game for the most part and in todays fast paced world people wouldn't appreciate that style of fighting even though it had it's merit Jack would have to tweak his style abit and get a little more busy. A modern ref wouldn't allow all that holding. If he can adapt his style a little bit then he does very well given his natural ability.
     
  14. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,853
    10,061
    Jul 15, 2008
    Marciano would be murdered at heavyweight ...

    Johnson would be a better Chris Byrd ... stronger and harder hitting ...

    Frazier would kick ass ...
     
  15. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. Full Member

    55,255
    10,363
    Jun 29, 2007
    I think all three of them would struggle in different ways. The best heavyweights today are not only top boxers, but also very large and powerful men, who for the most part pack a punch.

    Each man would have questions that would need to be answered.

    Marciano would be the smallest of the bunch. Can a 187 pound man with a 67" reach thrive in a modern heavyweight division? In addition the 12 round limit might hurt Rocky’s chances more than the other three.

    Fraizer had the least upside of the three, since he was pretty much a modern fighter. However I do think Frazier competition as champion and x- champion was the best of the three. Frazier never beat the top punchers, and this heavyweight division has its share of power punchers that Frazier would need to out last to reach the top.

    Johnson prime was 100 years ago. In that sense, he has the biggest room for improvement. Athletically I would say Johnson was the best of the three on offense and defense, however he might have had the weakest chin of the three, and lacked rare no-retreat no-surrender fire of Rocky and ‘Smoking Joe.

    So who would struggle the most? I am still un-decided.