Which past HW king is the most overrated?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Ryan O'Reilly, Apr 4, 2012.


  1. Manning

    Manning Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,433
    1,008
    Mar 6, 2011
    So with "supplements" Adamek became this enormous muscle bound monster that is clear for all to see.


    This content is protected



    Sorry, What?
     
  2. Cael

    Cael Claudia Cardinale Full Member

    3,379
    8
    Sep 17, 2010

    Obviously i don't

    Who did he beat anyway?
    Evan Fields was like the poor mans version of sugarfoot Bonavera.
    He just managed to get a decision over Foreman's corpse and lost to the glass jawed fraud LHW Moore who got KTFO by the same decaying Foreman.

    Could you imagine what a prime Foreman or Axel Schultz would do to either one of them :shock:



    Btw....adding "um" does not make your name in any shape or form original.









    (this post is a pamphlet and should be taken accordingly)
     
  3. Caelum

    Caelum Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,404
    51
    May 16, 2010
    Supplements can make you "increase" weight. It doesn't have to make you a "muscle bound monster."
    That's what the original intention of supplements are/were for.

    And different "supplements" = different results/looks.

    He was more of a LH, CW at best who increased his weight to get to HW. And it wasn't over a long period of time.

    Weight increase can also be evenly divided or focused on one part of the body more so the other.
    Some go for bigger legs/lower body and some go for a heavier growth up top.

    I prefer video over pictures

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11UqINux0m0[/ame]

    And some can look better in one fight, still hold on to the weight, but not look quite as "in shape."
     
  4. Caelum

    Caelum Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,404
    51
    May 16, 2010
    This content is protected
    Try using google first before you make an attempt at an amateur insult :lol:
     
  5. Cael

    Cael Claudia Cardinale Full Member

    3,379
    8
    Sep 17, 2010


    The comment was a joke, a joke that apparently went over your head, despite me pointing it out.
    :gsg
     
  6. Caelum

    Caelum Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,404
    51
    May 16, 2010


    Edit:

    Hahaha.

    I must be high and not paying attention. I didn't even look at your name.

    Stupidity on my part. Hahaha




    ...
     
  7. Oh that's right,they're all overrated because they aren't Klitschko brothers.
     
  8. Except for the 70's, or 90's
     
  9. Wrong about Foreman. Adamek is 6'1" and Foreman was 6'4"
    Adamek was no heavier than 222 so far and Foreman weighed as heavy as 275. Perhaps no one told you that Foreman was a 2 time linear champion who won the second title 20 years after the first one after a 10 year retirement. Foreman is a serious ATG who would KO most of today's HW fighters.
    Tyson admitted to every crime he ever committed yet he maintains his innocence about the fake **** that he never did. He didint **** that woman!
    Frazier weighed 202 LBS at his lightest and fought as high as in the 220s. Plenty big enough to fight as a HW today! Wrong again dick nose.
    And then you have the balls to insult America! My god. Everyone the Klischko brothers beat,Prime Tyson would beat in 3 rounds easy.
    And dont disrespect our country either you ****ing jealous *****.
     
  10. yeah sloppy enough to become 2 time lineal world champion. Foreman being "sloppy" didint effect him being great in the ring so why mention it?
     
  11. timagen

    timagen Guest

    Way to represent!:bbb