I say Hopkins' performance was better because there were less X factors going into this fight. Everyone already knew Pavlik was somewhat limited. But everyone also knew that he was a prime, young, hungry, and very dangerous fighter. The question wasn't whether Hopkins can win, (although i know some fans did pick him), but rather if Pavlik would KO him or not. It's just Hopkins' incredible ring skills made it a mismatch. The Pacman/DLH had a lot more variables. There was DLH moving down to WW for the first time in 7 years and how that might affect him. Turns out it did affect him. Who expected him to weigh 147 come fight night and weigh less than Pacman? That was a complete shocker. Also, Pacman weighed only 3-4 lbs more on fight night against DLH from his previous two fights when he was at 145. So he was the same guy. I just think he fought a shot DLH. I think the DLH that fought PBF would've KOed Pacman because he was 164 on fight night. Thoughts?
What makes Hopkins' domination impressive is his age, that is more prominent in my mind that anything else. But Pacquiao showed immense skill - he was being slick when pinned against the ropes. He was bobbing and weaving. Pacquiao impressed me more, just because his performance sticks out more.
