Which PPV main event is better value for money: May v Berto or GGG v Lemieux?

MAYWEATHER VS BERTO

It's the experience and the master class that I want to see.

 

The marketplace will decide ... let's see which does more buys.

My money is on Money to outsell the other fight. We'll see.

 

What is the point of asking this question, which is better, Mayweather vs Cotto or Golovkin vs Munroe?

 

I would say Mayweather will outsell, but it's not really a fair comparison when Mayweather's market is so much bigger (no, that's not an innuendo...) since so many more casual fans know of Mayweather and purchase his fights, regardless of who he fights. Mayweather, after all, has spent much longer building his brand, it's more widely know, and people purchase that brand, regardless, so Mayweather generating more buys is not really an indicator that May-Berto is a better buy than GGG-Lemieux, moreso it's a confirmation that Mayweather's brand is better than Golovkin's brand.

I'm kinda with Rummy on this one. I hope both tank, so that maybe at the very least, we will see PPV pricing drop some. $80+ for an HD PPV card is getting ridiculous.

 

Hopefully David vs Gennady will be a reasonable PPV price. No need for $50 PPV's
, how about $29.99 instead. That's the revolution.

 

Hmmm... Depends on the prices. If May-Berto is standard 65-75 bucks, and GGG is priced competitively, I'd imagine it's close with Mayweather doing slightly better numbers.

Edit: but I can't say which is more value for the money until I know the prices. Golovkin will be more exciting but a shorter match, both are mismatches but Golovkin's should be more competitive.

 

Not even close.

You would have to pay me to stay and watch the shi7 fest that will be a Mayweather vs Berto...on

 

no, mayweather will do far better numbers. casuals dont give 2 ****s about ggg/lemieux, they want to see what mayweahter is doing.

 

Yea I think so too. With Golovkin, his haters won't pay. With Mayweather, his lovers and haters tune in lol