Which Title Has More Credibility???

Until proven otherwise, currently the Ring, though right now that's in question. Lineal is the other big one, but BOTH can be held hostage. That is their downfall. Of the one's listed, the Ring is most credible to me.

The WBA is the oldest and first of the ABC titles, so you could consider it for historical value.

Let's not forget the Unified title, but that is DAMN hard to do these days.

 

Lineal > Ring > WBA, WBO, IBF, WBA


And many times (90% of times) the Lineal is also the Ring champ.

 

True champion? When they get all 4 of those

 

You will have one champion every 7 years and some divisions without any Champion at all.

 

thats how it goes

 

You forgot to mention the IBO and IBA............

 

the ring...but out of the ABC's ...the WBC

 

Why the WBC?

 

thats how i feel at the moment...i think they have been doing pretty good compared to the rest of the sanctioning bodies....except for the chaos that they caused in the HW division...but besides that i think they've done pretty good...not that they dont have their flaws

 

Fair enough. I think they should all be banned lol....but I got ya.

 

Any answer other than the ring is simply ignorant.

It isn't that the ring rankings are perfect, they are far from it. However, they are CLEARLY CLEARLY the best at deciding who the real champ is in any particular weightclass.

People on this site should be educated enough to know that is true without me having to cite the VERY NUMEROUS examples of ridiculous ABC champions.

 

Exactly.

 

It doesn't matter.


In some cases its the ring in other cases its the IBF or WBC. It's all on the fighter.

Like when Lennox Lewis was stripped or vacated belts. The one he was defending was the true title.