which trainer could have gotten the most out of which fighter?

I think Freddie Roach would have got the best out of Manny Steward.:yep








(thread title)

 

Why would a trainer help a trainer? Erm maybe jeff should have learnt from roger and floyd more becasue his career has been a lot worse than them.

 

Floyd Sr is a very overrated trainer IMO.

On topic..... Tommy Brooks and Lennox Lewis would have been a great pairing :yep

 

I think Cotto is fine with Steward.

Lewis was to be honest, Brooks might have retained a bit of an edge to his boxing though..... to stop guys like Tua rather than go the full 12.

Both are pretty calm characters and suit Lewis well....

I like Richardson as well - a really smart planner, up there with the best.

Talkers are the best, you don't need a shouter and screamer IMO.

 

Jorge Rubio to sort out Floyd's defence :yep

 

I always wonder what might have been had a 7 year old Naseem Hamed walked into Freddie Roach's gym, rather than Ingles.

 

Same move everytime, Beeston. Same move everytime.....

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDZFQCgsVw8[/ame]

 

Imo nobody would be better for hamed than brendan was

 

I'm not sure. I'm just not a fan of the Ingle style. There's a reason why the orthodox style developed. And it's not cause it's better to swtich stance every 30 seconds and throw looping punches from bizarre angles.

It worked for Naz for a long time, and he'd have been an unorthodox fighter whatever but I think If someone had grounded him properly early on in a more orthodox style he;d have had longer lasting success as his reflexes started to slow.

 

Roach would have catapulted Hamed into the Atlantic.

Nobody would put up with the sort of **** Ingle put up with...... money or not.