Which Vargas was better, the one who lost to Trinidad or who lost to De La Hoya?

This isn't even a legit question. There's only one answer to this. Obviously the Vargas who fought Tito. Anyone who says otherwise is a DLH fanboy.

 

The Vargas Tito beat was cleary superior he was ruined by Tito. Only a Oscarsexual or fool would argue otherwise.

 

It's almost this simple. How had Vargas looked against BETTER COMP before Tito then he did against weaker comp after. Night and ****in day.

 

I've got a vague memory of Vargas looking like crap and getting floored early on in the fight after he fought Trinidad, is that correct?

 

Steak to a baby? :huh M.R.

 

I second that notion... 100% on the money :good { N.Y.C.}

 

yeah FW, he got floored by rivera in the 2nd round and was hurt bad.

 

The Vargas that fought Tito.

 

my vote goes to the vargas that fought Mosley..lol

This content is protected

:deal

naw really...The Vargas that fought Tito was better...but Tito ruined Vargas..he was only like 22....he wasnt ready but his handlers figured if he beat Tito that he would get a shot @ DLH!!! bad move!!!:good

 

I personally woulda used the

This content is protected

:deal analogy ...lol

 

This content is protected

:huh

 

This content is protected

:-(

 

Doylexxx, El Matador, jimmy1991, juice289, klion22, knockout, MexicanJew, Relentless, Royal-T-Bag, Shane_Erich, tampa

Shame on you guys!! :nono

 

:good Amen