Which was a better win at that time?BHop vs Tito or Calzaghe vs Lacy?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Auracle21, Sep 28, 2012.


  1. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    so joes win over hopkins isn't as good as hopkins win over a former welter in trinidad? :nut
     
  2. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    no, lacy was the favorite in the UK. only slightly though. in america lacy was a huge favorite.
     
  3. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    well you're one of the thickest on the site. so i'd check to see if it wasn't yourself.
     
  4. Thatman

    Thatman No respond troll pactards banned

    5,744
    0
    Jun 10, 2012
    Hopkins over Tarver and it isn't close.
     
  5. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    the question is about trinidad, not tarver.
     
  6. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    anytime a legendary fighter beats another legendary fighter it is a better win, regardless of the fact Trinidad had not fought much at middleweight. Lacy was not the level of fighter Trinidad was. Hopkins win is much better, although I still think Joe was a great fighter.
     
  7. Atlanta

    Atlanta Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,688
    6
    Dec 26, 2009
    Is this even a question?