Which was the better win?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Mod-Mania, Apr 3, 2018.


The Better Win

  1. Joshua over Parker

    60.6%
  2. Wilder over Ortiz

    39.4%
  1. thesmokingm

    thesmokingm Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,033
    4,323
    Nov 18, 2009
    And? Why you so butthurt?
     
  2. OpinionOfACasual

    OpinionOfACasual Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    5,111
    3,981
    May 3, 2017
    Are you bi-polar?


    I have no issues with an opinion.....but don't lie and say that isn't what you said.
     
  3. thesmokingm

    thesmokingm Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,033
    4,323
    Nov 18, 2009
    Then why do you keep quoting and acting butthurt? You started with this ****.
     
  4. OpinionOfACasual

    OpinionOfACasual Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    5,111
    3,981
    May 3, 2017
    I asked for your opinion lol.

    You're the only one swearing and getting worked up so much you have to lie.
     
  5. thesmokingm

    thesmokingm Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,033
    4,323
    Nov 18, 2009
    Lie? WTF are you on? You start off by calling me an arguer, referring to me two times, re-righting what I wrote, calling me a liar. And I'm the triggered one rofl. Stop being a tool man. And all because I think Windmills had the better win. :asz:
     
  6. OpinionOfACasual

    OpinionOfACasual Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    5,111
    3,981
    May 3, 2017
    @thesmokingm - "AJ's win doesn't do much for him, probably drops his stock if anything at all."

    @OpinionOfACasual - "Holding 3 belts in a division = Drop in stock.....That's what you said."

    @thesmokingm - "Wrong that not what I wrote. You be trolling again. Go ahead actually quote what I wrote. You have a hard on for AJ it seems. I don't pay much attention to AJ or Windmills tbh. They both kinda suck."



    It's all there....You lied that's what annoyed me, not your opinion.
     
  7. thesmokingm

    thesmokingm Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,033
    4,323
    Nov 18, 2009
    The one lying is you, with that crappy paraphrasing. You know what that is right? Nevermind don't quote me troll.
     
  8. OpinionOfACasual

    OpinionOfACasual Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    5,111
    3,981
    May 3, 2017
    What cannot speak cannot lie.

    It's there for everyone to see.
     
  9. thesmokingm

    thesmokingm Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,033
    4,323
    Nov 18, 2009
    Roflmao, you are triggered. I dare you to not quote me and let it end, but you can't can you?
     
  10. chitownfightfan

    chitownfightfan Loyal Member Full Member

    34,569
    1,280
    May 31, 2010
    If you're going to compare fights you need to get your ish together.
    Lewis' jab was on par with Wlad, Vitali, Rays, George, and Holmes.
    Tua was in the Same Peter, Hasim Rahman level.
    Joshua's jab is nowhere near as good as old Wlad, either Fury, or for that matter, Joey Ps.
    While Joey Ps jab is comparable to Holyfield Bowe and just saw him out jab the far longer Joshua.

    You're making subjective comparisons based on ethnicity alone and the only other comparable attributes are the fact they share a chosen profession.

    Facepalm
     
  11. Holler

    Holler Doesn't appear to be a paid matchroom PR shill Full Member

    13,211
    25,203
    Mar 12, 2018

    Interesting, if we interpreted better win on those terms then I'd agree with you simply by virtue of how close Wilder came to losing. I'm not sure that's how I see it though as part of the objective is not to be put in that position in the first place. I guess I'm saying it's difficult to separate the performance from the story of the fight, but I do get where you're coming from with your interpretation of the question.
     
    Northadox likes this.
  12. OpinionOfACasual

    OpinionOfACasual Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    5,111
    3,981
    May 3, 2017
    On ethnicity alone?

    Lewis used his jab to control the distance....
    Joshua controlled the distance with a jab....


    Lewis had a significant size advantage....
    Joshua had a significant size advantage....


    If both were Black, samoan etc etc i'd be making the same comparisons.
     
  13. thesmokingm

    thesmokingm Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,033
    4,323
    Nov 18, 2009
    Yea, sure the objective was to not be put in that place but no one gave Windmills a chance vs Ortiz. I didn't forsee Ortiz going life and death with Windmills either.
     
  14. OpinionOfACasual

    OpinionOfACasual Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    5,111
    3,981
    May 3, 2017
    Not true.

    Ortiz was the bookies favorite.
     
  15. Holler

    Holler Doesn't appear to be a paid matchroom PR shill Full Member

    13,211
    25,203
    Mar 12, 2018
    Pre fight I was very confident that Wilder would beat Ortiz. This was based on watching Ortiz's last three performances, he was clearly a fighter on the decline. How much was age and how much the removal of PEDS is unclear, but he wasn't the force he had been and I think Wilder's team were fully aware of that, particularly once Haymon signed him. Look at his record, they're not risk takers and in Breazeale as his next opponent they've shown that once more.
     
    chitownfightfan likes this.