And Ortiz nearly had him out of there were it not for the ref. And by non-fanboy cards nearly everyone had Ortiz ahead. An yet...
? Here's the odds pre-fight https://www.oddsshark.com/boxing/deontay-wilder-vs-luis-ortiz-betting-odds
The MOTHER INTERCOURSING REFEREE CONTROLLED THE MOTHER INTERCOURSING DISTANCE YOU MOTHER INTERCOURSING CASUAL
You may be confused a bit. I said literally, that I felt Joshua fought the better fighter in Parker, nor did I say anything whatsover regarding youth? I also stated I felt Wilder ko Ortiz was a better win despite me ranking Parker > Ortiz, because the win was decisive. I can point to quite a few people other than myself that can easily give Parker 6 rounds in that fight ( I agree in the venue he was at he didn't do enough to win or secure a victory), but Joshua didn't control that fight any way, shape or form. He crawled to the finish.
The youth shout I made was in reference to Ortiz past prime Parker near prime...(though IMO, Joey P is far greener than Prime but wholly subjective) But the points you make are cool to me. Just wanted to show you what might be misconstrued. I agree that a Wilder KO win over a top 10 is more appealing but AJ earning a solid UD over the #3 was JUST IMO, the overall better W. Sadly the referee and judges in both events were clearly instrumental in the outcomes
Well, no one agrees with everything. It's all ultimately subjective. I agree wholeheartedly regarding the refs and judges though