Which was worse?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by jpab19, Oct 6, 2010.


  1. jpab19

    jpab19 Exploding Muffin Dad Full Member

    15,720
    5
    Jul 8, 2010
    Jones-Hopkins I or II?

    Hear me out, what im saying is that going into the first fight at least there was expectations that it would be good, whereas the second fight we all knew how **** it was going to be. I was too young for the first fight, so what do all of you think?
     
  2. bladerunner

    bladerunner El Intocable Full Member

    33,921
    133
    Jul 20, 2004
    The second one was a disgrace plain and simple.

    I cant think of a handful of fights that were worse than that one.
     
  3. igotJUIC3

    igotJUIC3 Boxing Junkie banned

    10,619
    1
    Jun 28, 2007
    no way the 1st was worse than the second its not even close
     
  4. jpab19

    jpab19 Exploding Muffin Dad Full Member

    15,720
    5
    Jul 8, 2010
    What I mean is that we knew how bad the second would be but the first had expectations, which I think makes it more dissapointing.
     
  5. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,060
    35,179
    Jun 23, 2005
    The second one hands down not even close.
     
  6. igotJUIC3

    igotJUIC3 Boxing Junkie banned

    10,619
    1
    Jun 28, 2007
    i get your point and yeah the first was a let down of sorts but part two was cringe worthy
     
  7. jpab19

    jpab19 Exploding Muffin Dad Full Member

    15,720
    5
    Jul 8, 2010
    Even though the poll is so one sided I think the first one was more of a let down. The second wasnt a let down for me as I knew before hand how bad it would be, whereas the first fight had Jones at 21-0 fighting for his first world title and Hopkins at 22-1 also fighting for his first world title with both looking very promising and it was pretty dissapointing.