Which weight divisions should be abolished?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by TragicMagic, Jun 25, 2019.


  1. HellSpawn86

    HellSpawn86 "My heart goes out to you!" Full Member

    18,149
    24,172
    May 6, 2007
    None, that's how boxers make their money. Especially the lower weight classes. Too many fighters from a round the world are too small to make the bigger weight classes. They get paid peanuts and aren't even aired on TV.

    I think the weight classes that get the most air time (147-Heavyweight) are appropriately competitive. My only problem with those weight classes are the belts and promoters.

    Having watched for a long time I've also seen fighters get stuck in between weight classes. Ex: Gatti at the end of his career, too small for 147, too big for 140.
     
  2. Ph33rknot

    Ph33rknot Live as if you were to die tomorrow Full Member

    22,746
    22,624
    Mar 5, 2012
    super heavy kill it before it becomes a problem weight loss fat ass
     
  3. JamesFosterGB

    JamesFosterGB New Member Full Member

    77
    65
    May 10, 2019
    Plus scrap the WBO. Merge the IBF and WBA. We only need max 2 boxing bodies. Also cut number of pros from over 1,000 in each weight class.
     
  4. roughdiamond

    roughdiamond Ridin' the rails... Full Member

    10,198
    19,459
    Jul 25, 2015
    They should abolish the day before weigh in system instead, which was mostly brought in to help TV channels/ companies.

    Nearly everyone would change division though lol.
     
    Jackomano likes this.
  5. Antigoon

    Antigoon Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,883
    2,657
    Oct 2, 2011
    Agreed. If there was only one belt per weight , there would be far less nonsense with "ducking" "a-side b-side" etc... Legitimate contenders would be harder to "strategically" overlook or ignore and we'd end up with a much bigger chance of the best fighting the best at a point when those fights would be still relevant
     
  6. It's Ovah

    It's Ovah I am very feel me good. Full Member

    14,882
    19,142
    Sep 5, 2016
    Abolish all the piffling little divisions at the lower end of the spectrum, and cap HW at 250lbs to eliminate all the fatties and freaks.
     
  7. It's Ovah

    It's Ovah I am very feel me good. Full Member

    14,882
    19,142
    Sep 5, 2016
    He's just upset because his boyfriend Bellew got spanked by Usyk and the iron-chinned power puncher Dorticos knocked out Tabiti :D
     
    Robney likes this.
  8. Badbot

    Badbot You can just do things. Full Member

    47,916
    36,630
    Apr 17, 2011
    Funny thing is that some in the MMA community are actually pushing for more weight classes. Luckily UFC and the other orgs are not making that mistake.

    What should stay are the classics: 112, 118, 126, 135, 147, 160, 175, 200 and 200+.
    Maybe keep the 105lb division. The talent there is sparse but they can stand on their own. And some guys just are that small.
    And maybe do something with Cruiserweight. Maybe add a new division at 220... I dont know.
    But these stupid super and junior filler divisions need to be eliminated.
     
    Limerickbox likes this.
  9. VBOX

    VBOX JOURNEYMAN Full Member

    5,733
    3,881
    Feb 8, 2012
    140 and 154. Nobody really campaignes at these divisions for the long haul. It’s hard to care about a title when you know it’s getting scrapped the second a fighter finally decides to move up to the real division.
     
  10. jaytxxl

    jaytxxl Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,568
    3,479
    Mar 1, 2010
    I would definitely get rid of 140 and 154 as history has shown that they’re not much different from 147 and 160.. It really just becomes a cheap way for guys to become 2 division champs or allow guys to stay way from tougher guys..
     
  11. titanic

    titanic Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,602
    3,950
    Aug 7, 2016
    This.
    Merge all them WBCs IBF, UBMe,IBeU, UMEWEE, WXZ etc ,etc into a maximum of 2 boxing council/org - no more no less!
     
  12. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    93,105
    27,838
    Jan 18, 2010
    The 2 lowest weightclasses (105/108) have less active fighters in them together as the next lowest (115). I'd say cut those and make 112 (flyweight) the minimum, and get rid of all Super and Light versions except Light Heavyweight (175).

    Sadly that, and certainly merging alphabet organisations (like some mention) would never happen, because that would cost all of them money, control and influence.
     
  13. RealDeal

    RealDeal Pugilist Specialist Full Member

    1,689
    1,829
    May 2, 2009
    This will never happen but I’d like to see them go back to the original 8 plus cruiserweight...but make cruiserweight 190, and then add a super cruiserweight division at 210 or 215. Then obviously heavyweight would just be anything above 210 or 215.
     
  14. DoubleJab666

    DoubleJab666 Dot, dot, dot... Full Member

    11,844
    15,621
    Nov 9, 2015
  15. Zhuge Liang

    Zhuge Liang Active Member Full Member

    998
    982
    Jun 30, 2018
    I think junior/super weight classes are there for a reason. Maybe in the past where the sport hasn't big as big as today, it's not really significant. But nowadays, with current level of competition, training method, strategy and techniques, 1-2 pounds can really make difference.

    Take Featherweight and Lightweight for example. Without a middle weightclass between them (the junior lightweight / super featherweight), the gap would be so big and many boxers who will be victim of being 'trapped' inside (too big for lower class, but too small for next class).