Which win was more significant Mayweather tko10 Hatton or Pacquiao ko2 Hatton

Dude....your arguing for the sake of arguing now. Just trying to "win" an argument of semantics... Pretty obvious.

 

No doubt! Bottom line...both of these guys are beasts! One's a master boxer the other a offensive moster....polar opposites but both share an incredible amount of talent....which is why these two need to square off if both win their next fights which I think will happen.

 

Man shut it. I won this argument a long time ago. I'm just having fun and that's all.:thumbsup

 

Ok....coming from you, stating that I don't have any intelligence is fine by me.....I'll be that. Afterall I have to look at who the comment is coming from.:good

That was NEVER your question of how many fighters have moved down vs up in weight. Your question or COMMENT wasn't that deep. It was a surface level comment and I shot it down.

Your agenda is "YOUR AGENDA". I'm not Cleo the Psychic brah...I don't read palms or minds. All I know is you had a pretty firm stance on no one moving down in weight so obvisouly you had an agenda.....I'm not here to analyze the situation just to post my comments.

Feel free to question my learning ability all you like...if that helps you feel better about yourself and your lack of intelligence that's fine by me. But you should really relax and stop getting so worked up. it's not a good look.:good

 

Really? You call that winning? You're even a bigger looser than I thought. No offense!:yep

 

K... my bad. I just see the same circles you are running around in...and trust me, dealing with fools, I can spot the circles.

 

This is my last response.

Read my post where it clearly said: How many fighters have gone down instead of up? I never said it's never been done before.

You said I have an agenda and I asked what it was. If you can't answer then don't respond. It's not that hard to understand.

I'm not worked up. Why would I be worked up over you? You couldn't answer my question because you're not bright at all. At least the other posters I debate with know what a question is and will form some kind of argument. Do not respond to my comments without legit arguments.

Reading is fundamental.

 

It's nothing personal. I'm just bored right now.

 

You can determine the answer to this question simply by asking yourself this.

We all saw Manny beat Cotto with a late KO to win the catchwelterweight championship of the world, which was his record 7th division. So if Mayweather fought Cotto and had a dramatic 2nd round knockout, which win would be more significant?

Game, set, match. Deal with it *******s.

 

Happens to us all, all the time. :thumbsup

 

Excellent point. Btw your signature is hilarious.

 

i would say pac's KO on hatton. though i predicted that pac will win, i'm surprised that he did it inside 2 rounds. floyd's win is also significant coz he took away hatton's 0, but i think pac's performance is more significant.

 

Thank you!

This content is protected

 

The only real problem with your scenario is that you made it up.

 

It wasn't a catchweight was it?

I thought it was an official welter bout - But I just checked boxrec - I guess you're right 145.

Still -

The difference here is that Manny - The smaller guy went up and won.

Hatton, the smaller guy, went up and lost.

Manny beat Hatton at 140 where Hatton was undefeated and did it far more emphatically.

Hatton had a moment or two in the Mayweather fight, Pacquiao destroyed him.