Which win was more significant Mayweather tko10 Hatton or Pacquiao ko2 Hatton

Diaz being useless isn't equivalent to him on his way down, although he did go down against Pacquiao. :rofl

 

Pacquiao-Hatton because it was at 140 lbs., where Hatton was champion.

 

Relax....:smoke You are coming off upset. Like a female on the rag.....and I know you're not a broad, right? Look...you didn't like the fact that I disagreed. I offered you my explanation (which so happened to be the correct answer) to your comment that you typed in form of a question. (How many fighters have gone down instead of up?)

You were clearing making your stance that NOT MANY fighters move down in weight. I replied with a small list of current fighters who did move down and up in weight. My whole thing was this.......if you didn't have an agenda to posting as if no one in boxing really moves down in weight, you sure as hell fooled the **** outa me!

As a fan you know it's not ture to imply no one moves down in weight when there are plenty of exceptional fighters throughout the history of the sport that moved up and down in weight. More fighters....GREAT fighters have successfully moved up in weight rather than the other exceptional boxers who could move down and/or up. But there's still a long list that backs up my stance.

Oh.....and I loved your attempt to be somewhat witty or funny with your "reading is fundamental" line. Yea....:roll: I'm sure you're NOT worked up.....that didn't sound forced or desperate at all..:-(.....Honestly....I almost laughed. We call that kind of **** "weak sauce" son. I don't even feel right having to put you out there like that because its too easy.

 

Wow, like Floyd will win anyone vote thread against PAc lol... Floyd is undefeated, and PAc's been ko'd TWICE!!!

 

****in floyd loses evey pol ever made about him :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

We all know that Hatton was damaged goods by the time PAc got to him. The man was staggered by a former lw champion Juan Lazcano. Hatton was ripe for the picking so keep it real lol... Who's win was better, Floyd's or PAc's when they fought JMM lol...!!!???

 

If caballero went up to fw n lost to gamboa, then comes back down to fly n looses to viloria, is gamboa's win more significant?

 

PAC is a damaged ATG.

 

More significant is Floyd simply because they were undefeated together.

More impressive or the style in which it was done was Pac...anytime you can do that to a top fighter its spectacular.

 

Floyd loses all polls while PAc's been knocked out and outboxed lol... And Pac did it all on roids or hgh too lol...

 

PAc's a twice ko'd atg legend to his fans lol... ****in cheat lol... After the two ko losses, and the loss to Morales...Pac started roiding up lol...

 

FLOYD ****in COWARD.

 

Pacquiao won more impressively

But Maywether stopping unbeaten Hatton in a battle of two undefeated Ring champs whose combined records were like close to 80-0.

Maywhether fight was huge at the time.

 

Nall....you kill me bro! #1...if Ricky was damaged goods when PAC faught him he was damaged goods when Floyd faught him! And that was at FLOYD's Best weight...NOT Ricky who was at his best at Jr WW. So Floyd not only beat the smaller guy in Ricky....but you are stating he was damaged goods. Lets not forget that Luis Callazo had Ricky hurt and in a tough, close, competitive fight long before Floyd knocked him out.....so did Magee! Both are NOT heavy hitters.

#2....PAC faught JMM twice at JMM's BEST weight....Not having him move up not 1 but 2 weight classes...and then have the nerve to not make the contracted weight. PAC faught a better version of JMM that is for sure and I think a better version of Ricky too based on the weight and nature of the fights......Rick had Floyds daddy training him!:rofl So Ricky was better.:deal

 

If PAC is on roids Nall then so is Floyd...afterall there is as about as much evidence to support either.:rofl