Which win was more significant Mayweather tko10 Hatton or Pacquiao ko2 Hatton

Paulie is no threat with his punching power. Of course Hatton was going to look good and it was MEANT TO MAKE HIM LOOK GOOD. That was the whole point and it went right over your head.

Hatton got saved by the referee against Lazcano. That is the truth. Not as much? Did you get hit for Hatton in both those fights?

Hatton won a title at welterweight, I'd say that is proven enough considering Collazo has remained a top 10 welterweight to this day.

Again, I do not see how you say Pacquiao's win is more significant when Hatton had already be KO'd. The guy who knocked him out and took away his undefeated record is the more significant fight.

You guys are getting caught up into the "sensational KO" and using that to justify it being more significant.

Of course, with the amount of Pacquiao loving that goes on, this does not surprise me.

As for your Kessler question: Calzaghe took away his 0. Ward was a great win, but Kessler could be out-boxed and had trouble with speed as was shown by Calzaghe. Calzaghe also showed Kessler had a problem pulling the trigger if you move your feet. These were all things Ward used in his fight.

 

Yea, but we also saw Hatton put Collazo down and we saw him win.

 

Im usually on pacs side when there is a pac/may debate..but i'd probably have to say that Mayweathers win was far more significant. Undefeated, pressure fighter, big body puncher, there was alot of hope that Hatton might just be the one to beat Floyd.

Pacs win was brutal and impressive, but not as important imo, even thought pac the smalller man, and floyd the bigger man, floyds win holds more weight. As does Floyds win vs Oscar.

 

Collazo is still a top 10 ranked welterweight as well. Yet people still talk trash about Hatton's win like he had a tough fight with some scrub.

 

Obviously Pac. He fought Hatton at a weight Hatton is at his best. And you can say Floyd KO'd him first, but that doesn't mean Hatton was ruined by any means. Hell, it wasn't like Floyd beat him up badley the entire fight. Floyd doesn't throw enough nor hit hard enough to inflict that type of long term damage.

 

:rofl Ok. Didn't have to move up..just didn't have to cut as much weight.

Ok, as you wish :rofl

 

Watch round 8 and tell me Hatton wasn't beaten up by Floyd? He sustained more overall punishment in that one round than from Pacquiao's quick KO, I can guarantee you that.

Did you even see him after the fight? Hatton was ABSOLUTELY beat up by Floyd. You need to watch the fight again obviously. Hatton was eating leather the whole night before he got KO'd.

You're trippin.

 

He had the fight even after 6 rounds.

 

Can't help him there then. People are seriously blind.

Some people actually think Hatton landed a punch and that is why Floyd staggered in the first round. Hatton actually missed, but Floyd tripped over his right foot and was off-balance. People see what they want to see sometimes I guess.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=unPpMgZQdME[/ame] -- 1:28

 

Don't forget the point deduction.

:deal

 

Wow...thanks for the guarntee...that and a buck can maybe get me a coffee.

Re-read what I said please. I said enought to INFLICT LONG TERM DAMAGE.

 

Hatton got Paq'ed convincingly . . :yikes

 

By your definition, Torrecampo's win over Pac is more significant than Morales win over Pac :deal

Torrecampo stripped that "o".

 

Is spreading lies all you can do? Really...WTF is wrong woith you eze? I know I give you **** for being dumb, but really...WTF is your problem and passing lies? I never said I had it scored 3-3 at 6. And you ****in know that. I said it was practically even. And with subjective scoring, I am certainly not alone. Just quit trying to tell others what you claim I say. TYou try to give me **** for being rude, and then pull this crap?

 

It's so easy to stump idiots just by iusing they logic THEY supply. :thumbsup