Whitaker Apologists Respond...

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Seamus, Mar 29, 2008.


  1. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    106
    Jun 30, 2008
    Certainly factors in, but not nearly as important. I value it, don't get me wrong, but it's just way too subjective, that one. I mean, for instance: Lopez vs Sorjaturong.

    Neither man has an actual, visible mustache to judge, but we know that Ricardo's metaphysical 'stache would certainly trump Saman's in every single category.The problem, of course, comes when we look at fights like Mayweather-Judah. Who has the edge in mustachoeity there? Not nearly as clear cut. You'd have to switch up and go to eyebrows in that one, and that just leads to a whole cluster****.

    No, best to establish a criterion around something more realistic, more easily observed and measured, more less-stupid-and-nonsensical. Why I went for jive-ass clowning. :deal
     
  2. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012
    Do you consider Jorge Paez the best fighter you've ever seen? Or does he lack some jiveness?
     
  3. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    Saman actually had an awesome Orientel Fu Manchu type 'tache between fights.

    Justsayin'.....
     
  4. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    106
    Jun 30, 2008
    Plenty of jive, but no ass. A solid 7. :thumbsup
     
  5. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    106
    Jun 30, 2008
    I don't know as much about Asian midgets as you, but I'd say Saman was as good a between-fights fighter as anyone this side of James Toney.
     
  6. LACMEXAME

    LACMEXAME Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,106
    0
    Jan 2, 2013
    I think Whitaker deserved the win vs Chavez but It was clear to me, that Chavez was not at his best. I never understood why that fight was at Welter. I always wondered why that fight was never made earlier. Not saying Chavez would have won, but I think it would have been a much better fight. At that time, Welter/DEBUT for Chavez, with the amount of fights he had, his age, lack of dedication/alcohol and drugs, wars in the ring and fighting one of the best defensive fighters of all time...that was too much for Chavez. That fight should have been made at lightweight or even Jr Welter. Not Welter.
     
  7. Drew101

    Drew101 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,769
    8,298
    Feb 11, 2005
    Sweet Pea did enough coke to kill several horses. A whole ****ing stable of 'em. So there. :bart
     
  8. Slothrop

    Slothrop Boxing Junkie banned

    11,540
    2
    Nov 25, 2004
    :lol:
     
  9. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    68
    Aug 18, 2009
    If Whitaker beat Ramirez in their 1st fight, then Qawi vs Holyfield #1 is #1 robbery in history.
    Because what Qawi did against Holyfield was far better than what Whitaker (never) did against Ramirez, including their 2nd fight
    But how many times do ppl complain about de decision in Qawi vs Holyfield #1?
     
  10. werety

    werety Active Member Full Member

    815
    11
    Apr 30, 2007
    Whitaker did NOT beat DLH. I've watched the fight so many times now just to see peoples logic in scoring it for him, its just not there. It really wasn't even particularly close in my eyes.