Said this on a couple of occasions, and I'll say it again: I'm a big fan of Chavez, idolized him growing up, and I have NEVER been able to find more than 4 rounds to give him. Whitaker deserved the decision.
Sweet Poo? That's the weakest **** I've ever heard. Congratulations on producing pretty much the dumbest post of the century so far. :good
One of the worst robberies in boxing I've ever seen. And this was when Whitaker schooled a prime, undefeated Chavez (87-0). Chavez won 3 rounds at most and anyone who thinks Chavez deserves the nod should have their eyes checked.
Glad we have someone else in this thread who "gets it".I mean,it's like,come on! If you ain't pressing,ya ain't doing ****. You're being close-minded,fella.It's quite clever,actually.See,the "Pea" in "Sweet Pea" is actually pronounced as "Pee",as in,"Please excuse me,I need to visit the restroom for a quick pee".So,in a humorous twist,I've gone about referring to him as "poo" - which is not quite the same,but similar in a sense.
It's something to do,I guess. As long as she's not sucking your grandpa's weiner,I'm not particularly concerned with what she's doing "down there",ya dig? :hammertime
That's basically how I saw it. I thought the fight could've potentially been close in terms of rounds (I generally score it about 7-4-1), but Whitaker's rounds were very decisive.
For the first time Chavez didn´t landed his accurate right hand against southpaws .and it wasn´t a matter of style .because Camacho had the same defensive style ..Whitaker was a master, and that made the difference .. 9-3 PW in my opinion....
By your argument a counterpuncher can not win a fight by decision. This post reveals what little kniwledge of boxing you possess, that or you are a blind Mexican.
By God, you are actually a ******. When people post that it is usualy a joke..but in this case...that is really strange. :blood