Whitaker v Armstrong 147 lbs

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Bill Butcher, Jan 1, 2009.


  1. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    15 rounds.....

    Lets say the Pernell Whitaker of the Chavez fight vs the Henry Armstrong of the Ross fight.

    Brilliant clash of styles, hard to call... Im taking Armstrong in a close fight that was just about even in rd 12 or 13, I think Armstrong takes the last 2 rds to win the fight.

    Apologies if this fight has been done before, Ive never seen or thought of it before.


    :good
     
  2. OBCboxer

    OBCboxer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,949
    226
    Jun 2, 2007
    This is tough to call. I'll go with Armstrong by a close decision. It would be too hard for Pernell to keep Hank off of him and Armstrong has a nonstop workrate. I think Armstrong would outwork him.
     
  3. Joe E

    Joe E Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,361
    42
    May 12, 2007
    Armstrong. The Man won over 50 fights at Welter and had 39 KO victories. 147 wasn't Whitakers best and he certainly wasn't strong at that weight. Armstrongs' constant pressure and swarming style would certainly carry him to a UD but if Whitaker tires late a KO isn't out of the queston.
     
  4. Sister Sledge

    Sister Sledge Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,129
    27
    Jul 24, 2004
    Tough fight. Whittaker was great, but this wasn't his best weight. Amrstrong was a buzzsaw and I believe he could outwork Pernell by split decision.
     
  5. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    92
    Aug 21, 2008
    Neither one really was at his best at 147. Whitaker was at his best at 135, and Armstrong peaked around what would today be jr. lightweight.

    At any weight though, I'd go with Armstrong, with his relentless aggression and workrate being the key difference. I think Armstrong had more to foil Whitaker's style than vice versa. Plus Armstrong was much more dominant and impressive shutting down Ross IMO than Whitaker was in unofficially outboxing Chavez.
     
  6. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    Armstrong was more impressive, but I think Chavez was more live than Ross was in their respective fights.

    Anyway, I'd take Armstrong via close decision at any weight. Whitaker-Armstrong is the type of fight I would love to see because it would bring out the best of both. Neither were seriously challenged in their primes (bull**** decisions aside) and this bout would have stretched both to their limits.
     
  7. laxpdx

    laxpdx Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,921
    77
    Oct 1, 2006
    My bet is on Armstrong. His unrelenting pressure would force Pernell to trade with him. Hank by decision.
     
  8. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    i think hank was probably a bit stronger at the weight and would use it to outwork him and pressure him to a close but clear UD
     
  9. Minotauro

    Minotauro Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,628
    713
    May 22, 2007
    I think this would probably be a better fight at 135lbs since both guys were small welters anyway I pick Armstrong via close decision.
     
  10. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    Oh well, so far everyone agrees with me & says Armstrong by decision.

    Whitaker was a master at outboxing guys but how do you outbox a man that just keeps coming & doesnt slow down from rd 1-15.

    I give Whitaker a better chance in a 12 rd LWT fight but even then I call it 50/50.
     
  11. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    16,275
    15,342
    Jun 9, 2007
    Armstrong would be on sweetpea relentlessly.
    Pea doesnt have the power to keep him off.
    Armstrong by UD.
     
  12. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    Whitaker by comfortable UD. Armstrong lacks the footspeed.
     
  13. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    armstrong would be all over sweet pea he would be up close closing him down he wouldnt need foot speed
     
  14. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    Yeah, actually he would need footspeed to, ya know, "be up close" consistently enough to do any effective work. It's not like they're gonna be fighting in a phone-booth or under special rules prohibiting Whitaker from using footwork.
     
  15. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    i know whittaker would be moving but armstrong would be all over him and i think you underrate armstrong. and pea wouldnt be strong enugh to keep him off especially in the later rounds.