Whitaker v Armstrong 147 lbs

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Bill Butcher, Jan 1, 2009.


  1. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    Why would he need the strength to keep him off when he has the speed and footwork to do so against an Armstrong who lacks the footspeed or explosiveness to compensate?

    He lacked the strength to keep bigger, stronger fighters (or at least similar stylists) than Armstrong such as Vasquez, Chavez, Nelson, etc. off him as well, that didn't stop him from giving them all boxing lessons.
     
  2. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    suppose he could out box him but i just see armstrong just walking through his shots and outworking him
     
  3. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    That's what everyone says every time a pure boxer is matched up with a pressure fighter.

    "He'd just walk through his shots!"

    "He doesn't have the power to keep him off!"

    When will people realize there's a whole lot more to boxing than power?
     
  4. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    i see where your coming from but i think in this instanse it happens
     
  5. OBCboxer

    OBCboxer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,949
    226
    Jun 2, 2007
    Vasquez, Nelson and Chavez fight nothing like Armstrong. I think Whitaker wins the early rounds with his defensive mastery and overall quickness, but Armstrong keeps coming forward and wears Whitaker down to get a close decision.
     
  6. pryorgatti

    pryorgatti Active Member Full Member

    1,180
    2
    Nov 1, 2004
    Whitaker's jab was his best weapon but his GREAT BODYPUNCHING ABILITY and angles can trouble Armstrong in this matchup.

    Pick'em
     
  7. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    They don't fight exactly like him, but all 3 were pressure fighters against Whitaker, one of them far bigger and stronger than Armstrong, the other two at least the same size and more pure pressure stylists than Vasquez. Nelson hardly took a back-step all night against Whitaker, fighting at a relentless pace down the stretch but never able to maintain any kind of success. Chavez was only made to slow down and back up when Whitaker began putting the hurt on him.

    Pressure fighters in general don't match up well with Whitaker (not many do to be frank), and Armstrong's style, which wasn't suited to cutting off the ring so much as tracking, wouldn't have fared much better IMO.

    If a well past prime Barney Ross was able to outbox Armstrong inside and out throughout the early portion of their bout prior to fading down the stretch I'm pretty comfortable in my pick of a prime Whitaker to win a comfortable decision, considering he was not only better off the backfoot than Ross, but with an even better jab as well.
     
  8. Mantequilla

    Mantequilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,964
    78
    Aug 26, 2004
    I dunno Pryorgatti, i can certainly see the argument for Pea winning, but i doubt his bodyshots would slow or bother Armstrong in the slightest.They would just be scoring points.

    I doubt even someone with McCallum-esque power to the body could bother Armstrong too much.It would likely need to be an Arguello or similarly big punching fighter.
     
  9. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    Pernell Whitaker isnt a hard man to catch, he`s just a hard man to hit clean when you do catch him.

    I dont see Pea using his legs like for instance the way Leonard did in the Hagler or 2nd Duran fight, I think that would be the best way to fight Armstrong but Ive never seen Pea doing that.

    Armstrong - especially over 15 rds - is on your ass from the start & throws a tremendous variety of punches, even Whitaker would not escape all of them & thru the course of the fight, both men would land often but Henry would land more & inflict the more damage throughout enabling him to pull away in the later rds IMO.
    A stoppage in a 15 rder is possible but unlikely, I`ll stick with Armstrong by decision. Close UD.
     
  10. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    Have you ever seen him fight? That was one of the best parts of his game, his ability to fight off the backfoot and keep himself out of danger for any extended period of time. That's why you never, ever saw him fighting off the ropes like you did someone like Mayweather. He did it all night long an a constantly advancing, power punching Nelson in a near white-wash boxing lesson.

    Over 15 rounds Armstrong more than likely would get stronger down the stretch, but I think Whitaker would be strong enough throughout the first 12 to win a large enough amount of rounds to hold on to a decision, provided this bout is over 15 rounds in the first place.

    You people act as if either Armstrong had extremely fast feet or Whitaker had cement in his shoes.
     
  11. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    Fighting off the backfoot was certainly one of Pea`s more effective weapons, I was referring more to lateral movement, fast lateral movement, the sort of legwork you might see from say a Willie Pep, in & out.

    I would pick Pep to squeeze a decision vs Armstrong primarily because of his legwork & defensive technique & even then the fight might go either way but I just think Whitaker gets outworked down the stretch, especially if he fights the same way he did vs Nelson.

    Thats the way I envision things anyway, might be wrong, might be right, who knows.


    Botswana :good
     
  12. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    Whitaker's legs would be a better asset to him than Pep's would the way I see it. I don't feel like being redundant so I'll just direct you to the other thread involving Armstrong where I explain my thoughts on that matter.
     
  13. OBCboxer

    OBCboxer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,949
    226
    Jun 2, 2007
    Ross was still a 2 to 1 favorite in that fight and was beaten soundly in that fight. It was also rumored that Hank carried Ross to the finish rather than just knock him out. All I saw in the early rounds was Ross fighting off the back foot and pawing his left out without any real conviction. He would land the right a little but Armstrong was landing the cleaner shots and moving Ross back.

    Hank didn't have anyrespect for Ross' power and would do the same against Whitaker since he didn't have power either. Not to mention Armstrong had a pretty sturdy chin and would not be bothered by Whitaker.

    Again, if this was over 15 rounds, Pernell would take the first five or sicx rounds. Then you would see Armstrong start come in and take some of the middle rounds with Pernell winning here and there. Once it gets into deep waters it's all Armstrong to win a close decision.
     
  14. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,217
    170
    Jul 23, 2004
    Whitaker doesn't need power to keep him off. He's got everything else to keep him off. Speed, movement, and the ability to land punches while he's moving at the same time aka doing it simultaneously. Thats laterally or on the backfoot.

    People need to realise that fighters like Duran and Armstrong aren't going to simply gamble and chase Whitaker all over the ring once they feel he lacks power. If they do that, then they are going to be getting outscored IMO. And they would also become careless if that was the case. Many fighters like Duran would be extremely concerned if they were getting outscored by Whitaker, power on his punches or not.
     
  15. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    Thats more or less the way I see things going down.