What is the criteria? There is no doubting that he is definitely one of, if not the, most famous MMA fighters in the short history of the sport. Is fame the key word here? Also the MMA hall of fame isn't really a very prestigious thing yet, so I say why not?
Well, it's not the Hall of Best Punch Resistance or the Hall of Well-Rounded Fighters or the Hall of Won Fights in PRIDE. It's the UFC Hall of Fame. Brock is, by FAR, their most famous fighter ever. And not just a fighter, a champion and one who defended his belt. But in the UFC Hall of Fame? You can't write a history of the UFC without including a chapter about the impact and title reign of Brock Lesnar. Therefore he makes it into the UFC Hall of Fame. The MMA Hall of Fame? Well, that's a good deal more debateable. But the UFC Hall of Fame? There is no case to keep him out except straight hating on the guy. Simple as that. :good :hat
Sorry, I meant UFC hall of fame, as there isn't actually an MMA hall of fame. Actually is there even a UFC hall of fame? Is there a physical place? Or is it just a meaningless thing they have on their website? Does it matter if his face and name are added to a page on the UFC website that no one even cares about?
IT seems meaningless. When you get into Dana **** house..you are no longer in the UFC HOF. Just ask Ken and Tank.
Frank Shamrock as well As an organisation the UFC needs to distance itself from any one particular individual ........ Dana White has too much power and it's not a good look when he hold grudges against fighters. I realise he is the figure head when the UFC was growing, he did a fair job, he now needs to step back a little for it to keep growing.