Who Accepted Defeat Like A Man - Juan Manuel Marquez or Manny Pacquiao?

Yeah, I get angry too, but to be like Pacquiao when it doesn't matter, and all that matters is that you know the truth, show much more control and less emotional.

 

If Pacman really did conceed defeat and take the loss like a man he'd admit he lost to Jmm. Thrice.

 

Why are we assuming Filipino and American media are biased just because they happen to think a fighter that has the same nationality as them is automatically biased? We judge a person's credibility based on their credentials and not assume.

Yea I thought pac won too, have always said he did.

I brought up the Morales fight because he made excuses for a fight he lost. He didn't dispute the decision because he clearly lost.

Marquez has a right to dispute the third fight. The majority of the boxing public thought he won. I thought he won. I'm sure he definitely thought he won. He also thought he won the first two fights. In his mind and many others, he thought he got robbed for the third time.

 

At this stage.......belts won't "make the man".....at least in Pacs case. He's held a lot of hardware throughout his career. If Pac decided to give TIM another payday a lot of fans would support it.....but it was so one sided and TIM didn't really try to win, that no one really wants to see it again. It makes more sense to go for JMM who has his own fan base and who offers a real challenge. JMM is Smart Business....high risk, but smart ...TIM would be dumb business with little to no risk at all. I'd rather see Floyd and Pac mix it up or Cotto and Pac rematch....but this will do.

 

If it happened three time like Marquez feels happened to him, I'm sure he would get fed up.

At least Marquez also knows the truth, and ins't afraid to let yall know!:yep

 

We have gotten off topic,but the answer is clearly Juan for the simple fact he avenged his robbery.. The excuse of "I already beat him" and PPV sales did not apply then..

In this era of politics and making excuses,these become valid..

 

Pac likes a fight and Bradley really didn't give him one.
But Pacquiao should have been more professional and gone for the kill. Roach should have been on his case even though he was in control of the fight.

 

That is not the topicatsch

 

Pacquiao has let it be known, that he beat Bradley, but to let you emotions get the better of you is not the manly thing

 

He ran out of gas,that is why,even the bias HBO cast said how he would only fight the last minute of the round with flurries.. Bradley was out boxing him,but these days out boxing,jab,body work,feinting is considered running..

 

It's not the same situation because Pacquiao hasn't been robbed three times by Bradley.

 

Every nations media is nationalistic to a degree.

Let not forget Floyd's words, support me because I'm an American.

This content is protected

Taking out media outlets from the fighters countries is a good thing to do.

You may get some fair judging but you would also get get a lot of bias judging.