Who are some of the greatest H2H fighters in the history of the sport?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by RAMPAGE0017, Oct 23, 2007.


  1. RAMPAGE0017

    RAMPAGE0017 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,624
    16
    May 30, 2007
  2. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    Well SRR is obvious. Variety of skills and adaptation. He could adjust and beat you so many ways. And this is from watching PAST PRIME tapes of the guy.
     
  3. Jbuz

    Jbuz Belt folder Full Member

    3,506
    7
    Oct 22, 2004
    At their best:

    Ray Robinson
    Willie Pep
    Roberto Duran
    Eder Jofre
    Ezzard Charles
    Henry Armstrong
    Benny Leonard
    Ray Leonard
    Salvador Sanchez
    Muhammad Ali
    Joe Louis
    Carlos Ortiz
    Archie Moore
    Thomas Hearns
    Roy Jones Jr.
    Pernell Whitaker
    Marvin Hagler
    Carlos Monzon
     
    Keleneki likes this.
  4. sues2nd

    sues2nd Fading into Bolivian... Full Member

    9,760
    8
    Aug 7, 2004
    Great list, I would also add Lennox Lewis, Bernard Hopkins, Michael Spinks (tho not vs Tyson....ouch), Evander Holyfield and as much as I hate to admit it Floyd Mayweather Jr.....and thats about it off the top of my head.

    Again, great list!!!
     
  5. Jbuz

    Jbuz Belt folder Full Member

    3,506
    7
    Oct 22, 2004
    Yep they are good additions. :good
     
  6. huki

    huki huk huk ^_^;; Full Member

    6,475
    2
    Nov 12, 2006
    I've always thought RJJ was the best H2H P4P fighter ever. At 160-168 he was as close to unbeatable as one could get.. just an unbelievable amount of natural talent, insane speed with one punch KO power, and an awkward style that anybody would have major problems dealing with. It's sad that he could have accomplished A LOT more in his career, but I think just by watching his fights from the 90's, anyone could tell that he was one of the greatest H2H fighters ever.
     
  7. MSTR

    MSTR More Speed Than Roy!!!!! Full Member

    9,247
    2
    Feb 19, 2005
    I don't think Floyd is as good as Pernell or Roy to be honest. He doesn't have the level of skills these guys possess. Close. But just not quite on the same level IMO. Same with, BHop, Spinks, Holy ect. If you are talking about the BEST h2h, SRR would have to be in their, Pernell Whitiker, Prime Meldrick Taylor (short ACTUAL prime but unreal talent IMO), Roy Jones Jr, SRL would be the first ones that come to mind. In the heavies, definitely prime Tyson, prime Ali, Lennox even prime Holmes who is under rated IMO. That said, before I hear the complaints, I don't rate most fighters of the older generation, so I imagine most lists will differ to mine.
     
  8. MSTR

    MSTR More Speed Than Roy!!!!! Full Member

    9,247
    2
    Feb 19, 2005
    Agreed. Roy is simply the best h2h IMO. No one could match the stamina, speed, offense, defense and most of all the unorthadox techniques he possessed. Prime Roy would beat most fighters in almost every area. He could fight both in close and at range also easily, back when he used to actually move on the ropes, and counter punch in numbers in close quarters.
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,065
    Mar 21, 2007
    Guys who rank higher on H2H than they would based on their acheivments would have to include Jones, yes. He would be difficult for any LHW who ever lived, despite his poor resume at this division (compared to other ATG fighters). So you can perfectly reasonabley put him in with Charles even though Charles' three wins over Archie Moore is worth more than Jones' entrie resume.

    Liston. Liston did achieve of course, but not as champ. You can reasonabley give him a top 5 slot based upon his skillset and mentality though.

    Holman Williams. Sounds like an absolute master boxer - him and Jones at MW would be a treat. Again, you can put Williams in with any MW ever and expect something special, but he never held a title or was even allowed to fight for one.

    Sam Langford deserves a mention. He could fight almost anyone between 160 and 175 and expect to win, and there are those who rate him very highly at HW too.

    Bernard Hopkins, at peak, is another guy who I think would pull wins out of the bag against some of the greatest fighters in his division. For example, it is possible for him to beat Hagler in my view.

    Floyd Mayeather may be deserving of a shout. I think under 2007 ruleset you'd be hard put to find many LW's, WW's that would beat him.
     
  10. Jbuz

    Jbuz Belt folder Full Member

    3,506
    7
    Oct 22, 2004
    You don't think a prime Ray Robinson (at 160, not 147) could match him? Ray packed more power, had a granite chin, equal speed (yes, equal), better offence, a slightly lesser defence, could fight in close better than Roy, could fight outside just as well if not better, and was just a genius in the ring.
     
  11. huki

    huki huk huk ^_^;; Full Member

    6,475
    2
    Nov 12, 2006
    Jones' resume isn't poor at all, it's just not as great as it could have been. I don't want to get into an old time vs modern fighters argument here, but to say that Charles' 3 wins against Moore are worth more than Jones' entire resume is ridiculous. As for H2H, I feel extremely confident saying RJJ would dominate both of them and stop them rather easily. Holman Williams vs RJJ would be a treat? :lol: Come on.. it would be a treat if you like mismatches.

    Liston is around a #5 H2H HW, but he shouldn't be mentioned as a great P4P H2H fighter, if that's what you're talking about. The only HW's that could even be mentioned as top P4P H2H fighters are Ali and Tyson. I don't think you could even say Louis and Lennox are, because of their fragile chins.

    Also, for a guy who seems to like old-time fighters, you're giving Floyd too much respect. He was a monster at 130, but 135 and up there are a lot of greats that would beat him.


    I wouldn't say Ray packed more power at 160 than Jones and I would say that no one in history at 160 ever matched Jones' speed at that weight, but just from looking at old tape of SRR, it's hard to tell. Since this thread is about P4P H2H fighters, the matchup we should judge is a MW version of a 147 pound SRR, with the proportionally increased size at 160 against a MW Jones. I think this is the most difficult old era fighter that Jones would have to deal with, but he would still win by decision in a pretty technical fight. RJJ's awkwardness would force SRR to fight Roy's fight moreso than SRR's style would cause Roy to fight his and this main factor would ultimately give Jones the edge. If anyone is getting knocked out though, it's Roy if he gets caught flush at some point. But out of 10 fights, I think Jones would win the majority of them. He truly was one of the biggest, if not the biggest talents ever and damn, it just pisses me off thinking about how much greater his resume could have been and how he would be judged now if he retired after Tarver I.. oh well. I gotta go sleep now. :hi:
     
  12. Jbuz

    Jbuz Belt folder Full Member

    3,506
    7
    Oct 22, 2004
    I disagree (on Roy beating Ray more than vice-versa), but a case can be made so I'll leave it at that.
     
  13. huki

    huki huk huk ^_^;; Full Member

    6,475
    2
    Nov 12, 2006
    Yeah, it gets real nerdy and silly discussing such high level talent/skill fantasy matchups like RJJ vs SRR, but I wish more people agreed that Jones would have no problem taking out guys like Ezzard Charles, Archie Moore, Holman Williams, and Sam Langford. SRR was a one of a kind fighter during the old era and those types of guys don't even compare to him on any level, but are still rated extremely high on this forum.
     
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,065
    Mar 21, 2007
    I was contrasting Jones' head to head ranking at LHW with his resume ranking at LHW and illustrating the difference between the two. I stand by the contrast.

    I'm also careful not to label Jones "poor" but poor relative to the ATG's we would be comparing him to in the head to head stakes. I stand by that remark.

    Top it another way - if you take the many, many, many wins Charles has v ATG fighters out of his resume and pair him with bums his entire career apart from the three wins over Moore he still has a better resume than Roy Jones Jnr does at LHW.

    Your surity that Jones would stop two of the greatest Light Heavyweights of all time "easily" is born of one of the following:

    1 - Stupidity

    2 - Ignorance of boxing

    3 - Hero worship of Roy Jones Jnr.

    4 - A devotion to the **** end of the argument you don't want to get into.

    Jones has a vulnerable chin at LHW. Charles is one of the best composite punchers in the history of boxing and one of it's best technical punchers, Moore is one of the greatest punchers of all time and the KO king for all time. Think about it.


    See above, but instead of ATG puncher you have an ATG boxer. IF Jones is intrinsically superior to Williams (by no means assured in my opinion), Williams is still a prototytpe for Jones. At the very least he is as quick and vastly superior technically.

    Yes.


    I like fighters, old and new. To me there is no difference.
     
  15. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    12
    Sep 21, 2006
    Those people are awful.

    Anyway from the last decade:
    Calzaghe
    Jones
    Lewis
    Tszyu
    Barrera
    Pacman (can overwhelm most people, especially Willie Pep)
    Mayweather