Who are the best fighters?

Bill1234 has more boxing knowledge in his left buttcheek than Sweet Pea will ever manage to learn.

 

Indeed it does. But that's not what bothered me (for a few seconds before it all escalated, now I'm bored - drop it).

 

I never mention you as a heavyweight nuthugger. I said that in general to seperate our different views on the question.

 

It is? Could've fooled me. But I already said, I would have interpreted it in the same way! I'm merely arguing in favour of Bill - it was fine for him to answer the way he did. Certainly not worth a sarcastic nudge

 

Your a **** stirrer. And your knowledge lacks in a serious way. Go on another thread and chat about boxing instead of getting caught up in others differences of opinion.

 

:bart

I'm defending my good friend Bill1234, who was being insulted by Sweet Pea without any warrant. If helping out a friend is a crime, then I'm guilty as charged.

 

Lets hear your view on the question then, instead of having a pop at Sweet Pea.

 

You called him an 'anal *****' who 'reeks of the sweat of a hundred gays.' Conveniently, you edited your post soon after...

 

Anyway afterall that, who wants a cuppa. Im going to put the kettle on.

 

If I were in the shoes of Bill1234 and someone responded with "Did I miss where he said Heavyweights?", I'd be pretty insulted.

Whereas any normal person would say something along the lines of "Why is your selection full of heavyweights?" or "I think some of the fighters in the lower weights, such as Greb in the 20's, were better fighters than their heavyweight contemporaries."

Instead, you have to make your usual dickhead remark, which I'm pretty sure most people here are sick of.

 

So now instead of refuting the fact that you did insult Bill1234, you resort to the "pot calling the kettle black" argument.

Brilliant. :good