Who are the highest risk - lowest rewards fighters out there?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by ChrisPontius, Feb 23, 2009.


  1. BADINTENTIONS2

    BADINTENTIONS2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,073
    0
    Feb 16, 2008
    thats low risk, high reward then....
     
  2. Blue145

    Blue145 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,060
    1
    Sep 3, 2008
  3. Bodysnatcher

    Bodysnatcher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,302
    0
    Oct 27, 2007
  4. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    That's what I said.
     
  5. 5Burowz

    5Burowz Guest

    Well, for any established fighter to take on any up-and-coming prospect is high risk/low reward. But, here are some good ones:

    Humberto Soto--seriously, nobody wants to fight this guy
    Urbano Antillon--a fight against Soto would be great
    Adrian Diaconu--
    Celestino Caballero
    Raul Martinez
    Joseph Agbeko
    Oscar Larios
    Ricardo Torres
    Librado Andrade
    Allan Green
    Edison Miranda
    Giacobbe Fragomeni
     
  6. BADINTENTIONS2

    BADINTENTIONS2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,073
    0
    Feb 16, 2008
    apologies i read it wrong first time.
     
  7. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    Mikkel Kessler is irrelevant at this time. Stop bringing him up and what Lou DiBella said about him every 5 minutes.
     
  8. Bodysnatcher

    Bodysnatcher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,302
    0
    Oct 27, 2007
  9. 2ironmt

    2ironmt Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,903
    1
    Jul 20, 2004
    yup don't get kessler either. yes he's not a household name in the us but who in the smw (or even boxing) is? he's still widely regarded as one of the best (if not the best) smw's, so if you beat him you'll get rewards (as in higher profile even some of the general public might catch a headline or two).

    Johnson's got to be the best example: so old now that most even boxing fans will discount a win, but he's still dangerous and capable of the upset like he almost did vs dawson. and johnson doesn't bring money into a fight either. Also, even if you beat him glen's gonna get people believing he was robbed so that would detract from your victory
     
  10. ecdrm15

    ecdrm15 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,264
    94
    Apr 30, 2008
    :good

    Glen Johnson is a great fighter to watch and is such a gentleman. Sometimes i think judges are conspiring against him.:bbb
     
  11. FINITO

    FINITO Boxing Junkie banned

    8,773
    2
    Jan 29, 2009
    Allan Green, Clottey and Judah.
     
  12. tony mush

    tony mush Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,632
    0
    Jan 17, 2009
    mike perez lol cliff causer wouldnt fight him in his third professional fight ha
     
  13. Kid Cuba

    Kid Cuba Boxing Junkie banned

    7,712
    0
    Feb 16, 2009
    Yeah but pretty much no one out there wants to fight him, he appearently called out Jean Pascal (before the Pascal/Froch match) and Jean avoided him like the plauge. Otherwise Glenn Johnson has to be the one.
     
  14. BADINTENTIONS2

    BADINTENTIONS2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,073
    0
    Feb 16, 2008
    would you rather fight miranda for rep if you're untested yourself at a big risk or fight a paper champion like froch for a title that you can at least use as leverage?

    miranda has fought better opponents than froch easily so it's not a tough decision for a limitied fighter like pascal to make this call.
     
  15. bodyshot89

    bodyshot89 Member Full Member

    344
    0
    Feb 13, 2009