Who are the worst Ranked/undeserved p4p ranked fighters

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by JohnAnthony, May 29, 2013.


  1. MrMagic

    MrMagic Loyal Member Full Member

    39,534
    71
    Oct 28, 2004
    At least Floyd won the lineage against Hernandez.
     
  2. Ripper11

    Ripper11 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,475
    2
    Apr 21, 2011
    why's your bitchass so obsessed with Floyd?
     
  3. JohnAnthony

    JohnAnthony Boxing Junkie banned

    9,988
    4
    Jul 9, 2010
    :huh why not. He'd just beat Meldrick taylor, and was undefeated 72 and 0 and been a champ for 6 years.
     
  4. JohnAnthony

    JohnAnthony Boxing Junkie banned

    9,988
    4
    Jul 9, 2010
    who gives a **** about the ring title. Broner beat the number 1 guy in demarco.

    Broner is underserving too. But if a fighter came through the ranks now and just won his 1st belt, even if it was a number one in a division, he wouldnt get thrown into -4- rankings.

    It proves the list are bias as **** towards americans
     
  5. JohnAnthony

    JohnAnthony Boxing Junkie banned

    9,988
    4
    Jul 9, 2010
    it was a very good win. But its still shouldnt be enough to enter into a p4p list.

    It wouldnt be now, so why was it back then.
     
  6. Ripper11

    Ripper11 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,475
    2
    Apr 21, 2011
    Genaro Hernandez is a hell of a lot better than DeMarco. Manfredy is much better than Rees. Cut this out
     
  7. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,463
    1,726
    Nov 20, 2007
    Currently undeserving: Pacquiao. 2 losses in a row (many say it's 3), one brutal KO loss, fighting someone smaller than him next.
     
  8. JohnAnthony

    JohnAnthony Boxing Junkie banned

    9,988
    4
    Jul 9, 2010

    WTF - why are load of people getting there knickers in a twist!

    Its simple. A fighter with only 2 title fights shouldn't be in the p4p lists. Hernandez wasn't even in the rankings himself, so how does beating him suddenly throw you in there.

    Rigondeux isn't in and he's a 2 weight champ with a win over P4P ranked Donaire.

    Seriously, some people will defend floyd to the death.
     
  9. Englund

    Englund Warrior Full Member

    2,545
    3
    Feb 17, 2010
    Because P4P is not 100% based on resume. Floyd's skills were clearly apparent in those two title fights. Fantastic skills + a dominant win over a really good champion = P4P #8

    I don't see a problem with that.
     
  10. JohnAnthony

    JohnAnthony Boxing Junkie banned

    9,988
    4
    Jul 9, 2010
    it proved to be corret, as floyd ended up being as good as the hype suggested.

    But the forums would have been going more ape**** than they have about broner getting in.
     
  11. Ripper11

    Ripper11 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,475
    2
    Apr 21, 2011
    I have Rigondeaux on my p4p list so that example means **** to me. Floyd was also fighter of the year that year too
     
  12. TheVrominator

    TheVrominator Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,804
    7
    Jan 31, 2013
    Taylor was pretty awful. He rose to the top fighting junior middleweights where all he had to do to win was throw a jab and drop a straight right in once in a while. Funny to see how Trinidad's #2 status evaporated after getting taken apart by Hopkins.

    Also, Slappy McCuffsHisPunches left alot to be desired but still found his way into the list. Feasted on second-tier guys and old men.
     
  13. JohnAnthony

    JohnAnthony Boxing Junkie banned

    9,988
    4
    Jul 9, 2010

    again another award that means nothing. who was hernandez. why wasn;t he in any p4p lists if he was so good!!!
     
  14. JohnAnthony

    JohnAnthony Boxing Junkie banned

    9,988
    4
    Jul 9, 2010

    who? :huh
     
  15. TheVrominator

    TheVrominator Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,804
    7
    Jan 31, 2013