who banged harder ??? Julian Jackson or Randall Bailey ???

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by RogerB, Dec 10, 2009.


  1. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    Jackson could probably shake up an average chinned heavyweight....... he was a ****ing murderous puncher.
     
  2. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    problem is who was better? Figueroa or Graham? Jackson had great knockouts against top competition.. Jackson was a harder puncher and a better fighter. He is the HOF, and I doubt Bailey will get in there.
     
  3. USboxer1981

    USboxer1981 The Real Def. MVP Full Member

    9,873
    2
    Nov 9, 2007
    sorry no ... stfu noob
     
  4. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,531
    83,347
    Nov 30, 2006
    You're really flattering Bailey with this comparison, mule though he is...
     
  5. TheGreat

    TheGreat Boxing Junkie banned

    13,028
    14
    Jan 12, 2005
    You are aware that Tyson was only small in stature right? The man had a 50 inch chest, 17 inch biceps, and 13 inch fist and usually weighed around or over 220 lbs, back when HWs were in shape you didn't get many guys over 235, Tyson while short was NOT small in the 80s.
     
  6. keith

    keith ESB OG Full Member

    3,627
    3
    Sep 5, 2004
    Just like everyone else has said. bailey hits hard, Jackson kills people with his punches. the defintion of PERFECT leverage on his punches.

    Keith
     
  7. evalistinho

    evalistinho Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,476
    2
    Feb 27, 2008
    Jackson and it isnt even close.