Tell me doctor how on earth was Dirrell-Abraham competitive?:huh Dirrell vs AA wasn't competitive. I guess at the time the fight ended you could've given Abraham a round....not sure if that makes the fight more competitive than beating a watered down version with merely a jab alone..Dirrell used many tools in exposing and impressively beating Abraham, whereas Froch used a jab. If a jab is more impressive to you than watching beautiful, warp speed counters, and watching an unbeaten fighter get trapped and raped all night to each their own. Infact Dirrells display was so much more impressive it ultimately led to him forcing Abraham to beat himself out of sheer frustration. Name a greater example of stylistic AND mental exposure.
How many times did AA drop Froch? You have to be a huge Dirrell fan (if such a thing still exists), to even doubt what was the better performance of the two.
I know I pose challenging questions to most of you that live off what happened the past Saturday or to Pacfans.
So a beaten and mentally dejected version of AA loses to Froch because of a jab alone and that's impressive? Aside from the jab what if anything meaningful did Froch actually land in the fight? How many powershots?
Yea us crazy ****ers tend to embrace the true essence of the sport many on here claim to be a fan of. Andre Dirrells boxing skill, intellect, and talent our a first in the sport. As in there hasn't ever been a boxer that can do everything he can do as well as he does(or did). I'm just one of the few people that can recognize and appreciate such things. Silly me:nut