Who beat Malignaggi better, Hatton or Cotto?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IsaL, Jan 23, 2009.


Page 1 of 7
  1. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,554
    18,243
    Oct 7, 2006
    Both great displays by great pressure fighters. Hatton had Mayweather Sr in his corner and looked better than ever. Cotto did what he does best, pound.

    Which win was more impressive, if you had to choose?
     
    IsaL, Jan 23, 2009
    IsaL, Jan 23, 2009
    #1
  2. Realspitts

    Realspitts Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,284
    0
    Nov 16, 2008
    the post pics of paulie answers your question.
     
    Realspitts, Jan 23, 2009
    Realspitts, Jan 23, 2009
    #2
  3. Paulie

    Paulie Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,049
    0
    Oct 15, 2007
    Herman Ngoudjo...
     
    Paulie, Jan 23, 2009
    Paulie, Jan 23, 2009
    #3
  4. BremnerBomber

    BremnerBomber Guest

    Which fighter made him cry :|
     
    BremnerBomber, Jan 23, 2009
    BremnerBomber, Jan 23, 2009
    #4
  5. rydersonthestorm

    rydersonthestorm Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,957
    17
    Sep 27, 2007
    It depends on how you see it cotto did more damage but paulie was in the fight more, hatton schooled him.
     
    rydersonthestorm, Jan 23, 2009
    rydersonthestorm, Jan 23, 2009
    #5
  6. griff

    griff WOODDDDDDDYA Full Member

    5,548
    0
    Dec 14, 2006
    Hatton did, Cotto/Malignaggi was a much closer fight!
     
    griff, Jan 23, 2009
    griff, Jan 23, 2009
    #6
  7. Mookhound

    Mookhound Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,610
    3
    Oct 11, 2008
    Hatton. But malignaggi fought better vs Cotto
     
    Mookhound, Jan 23, 2009
    Mookhound, Jan 23, 2009
    #7
  8. SouthpawSlayer

    SouthpawSlayer Im coming for you Full Member

    16,351
    2
    Sep 6, 2008
    eh as far as im concerned if you dont win a round against someone and win a lot against the other you done better against cotto

    logic
     
    SouthpawSlayer, Jan 23, 2009
    SouthpawSlayer, Jan 23, 2009
    #8
  9. ninebar

    ninebar Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,032
    0
    May 24, 2008
    Paulie put on some performance against Cotto and showed a lot of Heart, Against Hatton he stank the place out.
    Cotto's win was better because of the great Fight Malignaggi put up.
    Hatton's win was Good but slightly devalued by the terrible performance from Malignaggi.
     
    ninebar, Jan 23, 2009
    ninebar, Jan 23, 2009
    #9
  10. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    This doesn't even need asking, but I'll assume the author is making some other point. Hatton clearly.
     
    san rafael, Jan 23, 2009
    san rafael, Jan 23, 2009
    #10
  11. imp4pdabest

    imp4pdabest Guest

    Hatton did. Paulie almost came back on Cotto, Hatton just continued to dominate Paulie
     
    imp4pdabest, Jan 23, 2009
    imp4pdabest, Jan 23, 2009
    #11
  12. rydersonthestorm

    rydersonthestorm Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,957
    17
    Sep 27, 2007
    or maybe paulie found it easier against cotto
     
    rydersonthestorm, Jan 23, 2009
    rydersonthestorm, Jan 23, 2009
    #12
  13. KCD

    KCD All aboard. Full Member

    8,219
    2
    Sep 30, 2007
    Thats **** logic.

    Yes Malignaggi didnt perform as good as he did when he fought Cotto but could this be because Hatton didnt let him get into the fight and made Paulie fight his fight?

    I thought Hatton beat Malignaggi far better than Cotto. But, i think Cotto was at 75% when he fought Paulie due to having to make the 140lb weight.
     
    KCD, Jan 23, 2009
    KCD, Jan 23, 2009
    #13
  14. ninebar

    ninebar Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,032
    0
    May 24, 2008
    He found something against Cotto.
     
    ninebar, Jan 23, 2009
    ninebar, Jan 23, 2009
    #14
  15. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,554
    18,243
    Oct 7, 2006

    There's always a point.;)
     
    IsaL, Jan 23, 2009
    IsaL, Jan 23, 2009
    #15
Page 1 of 7