If you're going to say he lost against Arslan and Lebedev, then you have to admit that he beat Povetkin. Otherwise it's you who'll look like the delusional moron. No offence of course.
Huck vs. Povetkin was close, yes. But I had Huck winning just because he had the harder punches and did not looked gassed like Povetkin
i think he is motivated and has a strange bodytype. his stamina looks like **** but we have to say that he throws a lot of punches. i think he knows that he will get beaten badly by wlad and hence his motivation went down. but povetkin is a very solid fighter whith great ring iq and very nice skills. he is imo the whole package and very fan friendly. he is just unhappy to be in the same era like big wlad and big vitali
Povetkin was still on chicken legs when the robberie happend! He was totaly gassed only could fight 1 minute per round!
I make none of the above favourite to beat him. What's the big deal? Could he go through all of the above unbeaten? Probably not, but then not many in history would.