160 168 175 200 At his very best of course and likewise with the opponents. My picks: 160 - Nobody 168 - Nobody 175 - Bob Foster, Michael Spinks, Michael Moorer. 200 - Evander Holyfield That's it. Pretty impressive that those are the only guys I can reasonably pick over him.
Well at 160 you know I choose Hagler. 168 No one. 175 Spinks, Charles, Moore (maybe) and Foster (probably) 200 Holyfield and thats it.
Just the recent guys: 160 - Taylor ... another draw! 168 - Toney in the rematch 175 - Michalczewski 200 - Holyfield, Haye, Mormeck, Dong
No disrespect, but by picking Hagler I think you are underestimating your favourite fighter a bit. I personally give Hagler little chance because speed offset him greatly, I have never seen a MW quicker than Jones.
I'm looking to reduce the logic that stone age fighters have any chance at all vs. a magnificent example like Jones, we can move on from there after the majority have come to the realisation necessary. I don't think that we will get anywhere, but we can try, otherwise, let's not push it.
Yes, I disagree with that, but I am not going to get into a debate over it at this time, especially since you impress me very much with the majority of your astute outlook.