As I said earlier, I found your insistance on proof amusing when you don't feel the need to provide any for your assertion. And I said sorry for butting in, but you kept replying back to me. Relax a little IB.
Bottom line, pipe wrenched tried to discredit Dawson as a pick based on what some people might have said after the Johnson fight, and that's silly (preposterous, even - and enough so to get me fired up and demand proof that obviously wasn't coming). At the end of the day, as I've said, even if Johnson had won, Dawson would still be the bigger threat. Attempt to discredit Dawson as the bigger threat = fail. :hi:
:rofl What about the hour of my life you pissed me off enough to go digging thru 150 pages of old threads. You only knew you were safe, but like Lance pointed out there are a bunch of threads started by Calz fans laughing like hell at the thought of a Cal/Dawson fight. NOT YOU OBVIOUSLY, so don't start goin' all crazy and ****.
Yeah, 'debates' with Lance generally go nowhere because he is incompetent at it and just spins things around in circles, or hurls insults, either way.
You said it was funny that he was touted as a bigger threat because the same people touting him (implicating me and Amsterdam, being the ones holding that position in this particular thread) also bashed Dawson after the Johnson fight. I didn't. Amsterdam didn't. Nobody that I know of who currently holds the position that Dawson is the bigger threat than Pavlik did. I fail to see the humor. How was that funny to you, again?
Look I'm not gonna get you started again, but the funny part is I indeed said PEOPLE, which you seem to be feeling rather strongly stands for you and Amsterdam. PEOPLE is what I said, PEOPLE is what you initially asked me about, but something in your brain must feel you were directly implied.
I just said above too, that you DIDN'T bash Dawson. Intentional Butt DID NOT BASH Dawson. OK.....Got damn.