Who can point out what's wrong with these results?

The Lewis vs Holyfield decision was the biggest robbery I have ever seen - even Holyfield looked shocked when the first score was read out in his favour.

Calzaghe vs Hopkins depends on what you prefer, Hopkins landed the cleaner, more effective shots and scored a knockdown, but Calzaghe threw and landed more punches, albeit less effective ones, and was the aggressor throughout.

The other one is just funny.

 

Knowing Evander he was probably sleeping with her

 

thats exactly how the female judges score...... the ***** with the nicest arse, has the least knowledge of the game, or how to judge!!!!! :tong

 

from the lewis holyfield link:
"I feel sorry for myself. I've taken so much stick. But I feel even more sorry for Lennox." - British judge Larry O'Connell (who scored the fight 115-115)

does anyone know more about this? werid statement from him considering had he scored for lewis he woulda won.

 

If had actually thought about what fight he was watching, he would never have gotten any stick.

 

Puzzled me as well.

Its like he's saying "I feel sorry for Lennox, he was robbed blind in that fight. Oh....and I'm one of ****ers who robbed him; now people keep on calling me a ****ing tosser on the street. Ah well, its not so bad; I still have the bung money to keep me happy."

 

here is what is wromh IMO

1)the brit saying he feels bad for himself for scoringh that lewis dominattion a draw

2)espn, yahoo, and aol or whoever it was don't mnow **** cuz calzaghe won that fight

3) where the **** does anyone get exciting to describe the holt hopkins snoozer

 

why do they let bitches judge???

 

this is why there is only a limit of 2 women judges in the supreme court

 

goes to show women should not be scoring the cards.
it is a mans sport so **** off back to ballet dancing.
​

 

There was nothing wrong with Holt over Hopkins or Calzaghe over Hopkins.

 

hahaha exactly. what an idiot

 

Hopkins beat the crap out of Cal and still somehow lost?