Who can stop Mike Mccallum?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by thurmanthegoat1, Jul 19, 2017.


  1. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,159
    8,634
    Jul 17, 2009

    Can't think of anyone who have a realistic chance of stopping The Bodysnatcher
     
    thurmanthegoat1 likes this.
  2. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,234
    6,499
    Jan 22, 2009
    Ever?
     
  3. PernellSweetPea

    PernellSweetPea Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,116
    5,732
    Feb 26, 2009
    he lost to Kalambay at 160 and Toney and others.. He was not unbeatable.
     
  4. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,234
    6,499
    Jan 22, 2009
    I know. That's why I'm shocked the Bundini would only favor Jones and Monzon over McCallum at 160
     
  5. emallini

    emallini Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    11,274
    2,538
    Mar 16, 2008
    GGG puts him in a casket inside 6 rounds
     
  6. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,694
    17,751
    Apr 3, 2012
    Archie Moore, Michael Spinks, and Ezzard Charles have all weighed in at 168 and less. One them might do the trick.
     
  7. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,885
    44,662
    Apr 27, 2005
    Ridiculous isn't it.
     
  8. BundiniBlack

    BundiniBlack Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,555
    412
    May 20, 2015
    Just because those are the only 2 I would make the favorite vs McCallum doesn't mean those are the only 2 who could beat him. I think McCallum vs Hopkins Toney Kalambay and GGG are 50/50 fights. Not to mention underdogs win fights too
     
  9. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,885
    44,662
    Apr 27, 2005
    Yes but the thing is you only favor those two despite the myriads of great middleweights over history and McCallum not actually being a natural middleweight.

    SRR wasn't a natural middle either but the thing is he was possibly the greatest fighter in history.
     
  10. BundiniBlack

    BundiniBlack Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,555
    412
    May 20, 2015
    McCallum was actually a big MW despite him starting at 154.

    I also don't rate fighters who fought the majority of their career before 1960 with post 1960 fighters. The game was just too different to compare them.

    In that post 1960 era McCallum is top 12ish P4P and truly one of the most underrated resumes by even the most Hardcore Boxing fans
     
  11. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,885
    44,662
    Apr 27, 2005
    There plenty of good footage to rate the likes of SRR and co.

    McCallum top 12 P4P since 1960? Surely you jest. He slipped in at 79 on the Rings best 80 of the last 80 years and they had 35 or more ahead of him in the 1960 forward mob. Wild stuff.
     
  12. BundiniBlack

    BundiniBlack Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,555
    412
    May 20, 2015
    It's not about film really, I rate SRR just not on the same list as RJJ. McCallum is in the same 11-20 space as Holyfield Barrera JMM Whitaker Canto and Spinks
     
  13. Grinder

    Grinder Dude, don't call me Dude Full Member

    5,856
    2,568
    Mar 24, 2005
    Agree with this. The Hawk couldn't do it, and he landed some decent shots. G-man was relentless and maniacal. If G-man couldn't, nobody could.
     
  14. Grinder

    Grinder Dude, don't call me Dude Full Member

    5,856
    2,568
    Mar 24, 2005
    This is a question of a KO not winning the fight. McCallum is all wrong for Tommy boy, like Barkley etc. He has the punch but if he can't take you out he is a lame duck.
     
  15. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,885
    44,662
    Apr 27, 2005
    You had him top 12 a minute ago. McCallum resume wise isn't near Holyfield and Spinks let alone Whitaker. Jesus H.

    SRR not on the same list as RJJ? Enough said.
     
    Eddie Ezzard and Clinton like this.