You not noticed how no one mentions Louis in the list of fighters that beat Fury ? Wilder also sparks Louis, to long with that dynamite right for little joe Louis
It's all hypothetical. It's very possible Fury would have beaten all of them. It's also possible that all of them would have beaten Fury. We will never know, so stop with the definitive BS.
Lennox would have had the tyson on saturday out of there in five rounds way to much for fury for me, power and that jab was unbelivable he'd of pummled him there and a upper cut would finish it
I think a 34-year-old Wlad or 34-year-old Vitali, either one beat him and I know Lewis beats him at 34, maybe even a 37 years old Lewis
I find it funny. People talk about how great Fury is and then claim Wilder is garbage, limited, dumb etc. Yet, this limited, dumb guy managed to drop Fury 4 times, almost stopping him. Explain that. Lucky? Not 4 times. Fury not taking things seriously? Not 4 times. Either Wilder is better than people claim or Fury isn't what he's made out to be. In otherwords, Wilder cannot be garbage if Fury is great. Fury cannot be great if Wilder is garbage. It seems the Fury ass licking community has painted themselves in a corner. They either need to give Wilder more credit or admit Fury isn't as great as they claim.
Lewis would probably knock him out, but he would beat him by decision too. Vitali could do it, but I would favor Fury. Vitali is awkward though. It's hard to tell how someone would adapt to him. It's also hard to tell if Vitali could adapt to a guy like Fury. Holmes could do it.
The thing is no one who has posted in this thread picking fighters to beat him genuinely believes what they're saying or that any of those fighters could actually beat him at their best.
Personally, I don't rate Wilder very highly all time. And if Wilder could almost beat fury twice, I think many of the past fighters could've done the same. That being said, fury is absolutely huge for hw, so he will be a bad matchup for many.