Who deserved to win - Broner or Santiago?

I turned it off around round 6. Fight was boring and Broner looked like a shell.

 

Boxing is corrupt and broken to its core.

Why I don't give 2 hoots about that Dan Kinenenefhufer "mobster" guy who people are crying about.

 

The main problem with Dan isn't the fact that he's corrupt, it's the fact that he has a lot of blood on his hands. The man's responsible for multiple hits in Dublin.

 

Um, what?

 

He's the de facto head of probably the most violent drug cartel in Ireland. He's been implicated in a lot of murders.

 

Oh. What's his name?

 

Daniel Kinahan. The whole Kinahan family are a nuisance really.

 

Santiago, i had it 114-113 for him.

 

I had it 114-113 Santiago but Broner winning wasnt a robbery either, just the wide scorecards were a disgrace.

 

Fight could have gone either way, but to be clear this was two guys who should be fighting on USA Tuesday Night Fights, not a Showtime main event.

 

Do NOT insult the classic boxing on USA network from the past as this was pure garbage.

 

AB pulled a Loma and was asleep first half of the fight. Poor dude from Mexico was just happy to be on TV and get paid.
You could tell he was not going to burn any bridges but FFS at least say you felt it was a draw and not show so much grace to getting raped on Show—-Ummm Hoe Time Boxing in front of millions.

Best part, as always with AB, was the post fight interview

 

AB was asleep for first 5 or 6 rounds and then secured maybe 4 rounds and with the point deduction still should have gotten a DRAW at best!!!!