You got one other person agreeing with you and hes also Irish and says Macklin is Irish too. The Irish are world reknowned for blind patriotism and bias.
Your a child who cant debate boxing for **** and are a blatant nut-hugger. Macklin has beaten the better comp and its just that simple can you understand that without firing insults like a baby?
Ye I'm a nuthugger of a fighter who isn't even in my top 3 favourites in the division he fights in atsch. Tool.
The funny thing is i dont like macklins style but the man has come through adversity and deserves his shot thanks to his big wins against very good comp like elcock and askainen that cant be denied.
The people who voted Golovkin voted purely because that is what they want to see. There is no argument as to who should be ranked higher and, therefore, more deserving of a shot.
:deal Exactly, none of them deserve it, if any of them get it soons it by default as they're all young and all have padded records.
Ian Gardner outboxed Arthur Abraham, KO´d Latimore, also amongst others beat Toygonbayev who if you know him is actually a great old school fighter. 185-15 in the amas. He nearly KO´d Pirog in the first round but gets cut easily. He was also badly robbed in his fight with Khurtsidze. Malik Dziarra beat guys like Oral who is going to fight Sylvester next and gave Abraham a decent fight. Also Mock, the guy who David Haye barely survived against and was in many other good fights. He was quite past it when he fought Golovkin though. Golovkins opponents needed to match one point, they had to be cheap. That doesnt mean theyre bums. If you knew them you would agree. Now what have Belghecham or Martirosyan done?