Who did a better job against Paquiao; De La Hoya or Cotto?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by gr33nfather, Jan 17, 2010.


  1. Xerant

    Xerant Gotta Hate negociations! Full Member

    4,822
    3
    May 11, 2009
    not even close Pac was busted up after the fight
     
  2. Mr. Blobby

    Mr. Blobby Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,136
    0
    Feb 28, 2009
    where is the option to vote. > 'This is a crap Poll' ?
     
  3. Flexb

    Flexb Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,344
    264
    Jul 30, 2009

    Duh, he knew he couldn't do anything positive out there so decided to call it a day. His corner was already telling him they were going to stop it because Oscar wasn't doing anything and taking shots without answering back. He agreed to have it stopped and so it was. He hadn't been seriously hurt or even stunned, there was just no point to keep fighting when you can't even hit the guy back. He took a fukload less damage than cotto did and to even argue he didn't is fukin stupid.
     
  4. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    48,204
    9
    Sep 16, 2008
    De la Hoya was a dead man walking.
     
  5. Jacory Harris

    Jacory Harris I'm a gorilla I'm a dawg! Full Member

    7,906
    32
    Dec 30, 2009
    At least Oscar was willing to stand his ground and fight unlike Cotto who was running for his life.

    Oscar will have his brain in tact. Meanwhile, Cotto won't.

    Oscar received less punishment than Cotto.

    Cotto ran more than Oscar, that's for sure.
     
  6. venomus_p4p

    venomus_p4p Guest


    You are annoying. I bet you never get laid.
     
  7. Jacory Harris

    Jacory Harris I'm a gorilla I'm a dawg! Full Member

    7,906
    32
    Dec 30, 2009

    Mad because I'm spitting facts?
     
  8. thewoo

    thewoo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,769
    4
    Mar 3, 2005
    Cotto was fat more competitive not even close. That being said,he also took the worse beating. DLH wasn't really hurt, just tired of getting hit a lot and quit because he knew he didn't have a chance.

    Cotto on the other hand took a really bad beating. His face was all ****ed up and he was truly KO'd as opposed to just having enough. IF I had to pick over which guy I'd rather be the next morning I'd pick DLH without hesitation.
     
  9. VIP

    VIP Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,175
    2
    Aug 19, 2004
    Oscar didn't do nothing. Too weight drained to mount anything against the speed and combinations of Pacquiao. Cotto was at least competitive for the 1st couple rounds.
     
  10. thewoo

    thewoo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,769
    4
    Mar 3, 2005
    You do realize how silly this sounds giving that Oscar quit wheras Cotto went out on his shield.
     
  11. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
  12. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    The skeleton of De La Hoya lost the fight on the scales.
     
  13. Kayo-Kid

    Kayo-Kid Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,286
    0
    Aug 13, 2009
    I think its totally stupid to even vote on this pole, its obvious Oscar did much better than Cotto. Hoya wobbled Pac numerous times in the first 4 rounds. Pac jus couldnt see that left hook coming in and it did serious damage. The word on the streets is that Oscar was robbed, cos apparently he only signed up to fight an 8 rounder...:rasta
     
  14. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    Cotto did much better.
     
  15. lefthandlead

    lefthandlead Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,984
    878
    Jan 1, 2010
    cotto won some rounds, but took more damage. oscar didn't win a round, but didn't get hurt too more.

    winner is ........................ PED'S!!!!! lol