Who did better against Cotto: Mayweather or Pacquiao?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Vladimir23, May 5, 2012.


  1. Chempasillo

    Chempasillo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,431
    1
    Feb 5, 2011
    pac put cotto down, did floyd put him down or did i miss something?
     
  2. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,570
    3,763
    May 4, 2012
    Obviously Manny since he beat the crap out of him
     
  3. floyd_g.o.a.t

    floyd_g.o.a.t Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,735
    5
    Aug 7, 2010
    Pacquiao!!

    But I will vote Mayweather to **** off *******s :D
     
  4. Convicted_Felon

    Convicted_Felon Certified Savage Full Member

    678
    0
    Oct 3, 2011
     
  5. Primadonna Kool

    Primadonna Kool Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,545
    7
    Dec 5, 2006
  6. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    36,050
    24,032
    Feb 19, 2007
     
  7. Convicted_Felon

    Convicted_Felon Certified Savage Full Member

    678
    0
    Oct 3, 2011
    Manny Pacquiao used a catchweight, some PEDs, and a keen eye for mental weakness to decimate Miguel Cotto. Pacquiao was using PEDs and I could care less who disagrees with me. Let's not forget that he admitted to cheating during a 60 minutes interview. If he was dirt poor and used "heavy objects" to get into the sport, why wouldn't he use designer PEDs when he's made some good money to advance his career. If you have a cut corners type of mentality, you are a suspect anytime after that. He cheated (by his own admission) to begin his career so he is likely to re-offend. With that said, I don't respect Pacquiao's victory over Miguel Cotto. I know for a fact that Manny would want nothing to do with the Cotto we saw last night. Floyd was the 1st top level fighter to defeat Miguel Cotto 100% legit. Pacquiao and Margarito both cheated to defeat Cotto. Clottey gave Cotto a mean run and I think he could've won the fight if he wasn't for the complaining he did during the fight.