Who did better against Hopkins?.....Pavlik or Roy Jones(rematch)

Hopkins fought a version of Roy Jones that was at least 5 years past the "shot to ****" mark.

Hopkins fought a sick and injured version of Pavlik that would have lost to Bronco McKart.

Of course, Bernard Hopkins is "a living legend."atsch

 

you dont believe the fever,swine flu,cholera excuses do you?:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

Jones made it further then we all thought he would and it was obvious he had nothing left.

on October 18, 2008.......Hopkins took Pavliks soul.

 

I believe what Thomas Hausser reported. One of the most respected journalists in boxing was in the dressing room before and after the fight. Where were you?

 

Thing is, IMO at least, saying who did better against B-Hop is pointless considering B-Hop fought a totally different fight against both guys.

Although if your criteria for this poll is who took less of a beating and came away with less damage to their reputation then the answer is RJJ.

 

Does this really need a poll? You literally could not do worse than Pavlik. Even a first round knockout wouldn't be worse. Complete and utter domination for twelve straight rounds is as bad as it gets.

 

Pavlik's camp came up with the longest, most tired list of excuses after the fight.

 

You think that was bad?

If he loses to Martinez,.........then you ain't seen nothing yet!