Who did better against Malignaggi?

Khan looked better but maybe age had something to do with it

 

Hatton





"and if you could judge from their performance
that night who would won if they fight eachother?"

Hatton would destroy both khan or malignaggi. Cotto is a 50/50
I would favour cotto.

 

His legs had gone against Khan.

 

Hatton although I haven't watched the fight since so I'm only going off memory, I don't think any of the rounds were close it was just about as one sided as you can get.

 

tactical stand point khan but a mauling stand point hatton. both did a number on paulie.

 

It's pretty tough to have a better performance against Malignaggi than Hatton did, but Khan's was pretty impressive. I still think Hatton's was better. In his prime, I think he would have beaten Khan pretty impressively.

 

Has anyone notice that All 3 of these fighters that have Paulie Malignaggi as a common opponent....have Absolutely NO DEFENSE.

This content is protected

 

No one has punished Malignaggi the way Cotto did.

 

I think hatton. They all won impressively but i feel hatton just completely took over but same can be said for Khan

 

hatton ****ed him in the ass. paulie had nothing. but khan was ok, and not too agreesive buh got the job done

 

Khan did the best of those three, without a doubt. Paulie was actually fairly game against Cotto, despite taking a pretty good beating. And wasn't Paulie's hand broken against Hatton?

Khan delivered a great performance.

 

after the hatton fight, malignaggi admitted that he was more hurt in the cotto fight

in his fight against khan he never looked really hurt, he was just eatin too many punches

 

In the khan fight paul was outboxed in the Hatton fight was out brawled and in the Cotto fight he was deformed.