Who did better against Malignaggi?

In the Hatton fight Paulie was at his absolute worst (largely due to McGirt IMO)
In the Khan fight it looked like he'd lost a step all round but it was still a very good performance by Amir, I take nothing away from that.
Paulie took the most rounds (compared to the other two fights) against Cotto but had some serious injuries after that fight.

I'd say Cotto definitely hurt him the most but Khan edges it in terms of being all round more impressive. I really think Paulie with Sherif Younan (or most other trainers who aren't Buddy McGirt) would get the better of Hatton

 

hatton was the most impressive, dominating after the 1st round.khan in second place.cotto 3rd because paulie put up a fight with him winning 3 or 4 rounds.

 

Hatton was more impressive than the other 2.

 

Well I'll give you a hint... it wasn't a Brit.

 

Cotto exposed him first and scored a knock down....too easy next ..??

 

Hatton wobbled Paulie with every punch he landed and Hatton would have had a couple of KD's if Paulie wasn't grabbing on to Hatton's legs.

 

I would say Khan, but maybe that's because he is fresh on my memory.

 

if they wer all at ther best at 140 then cotto hands down, the weight draine cotto would have had problems with hatton but i think he could have edged it

 

Too me call me crazy but i say Cotto cause even though Paulie won some rounds vs Cotto, Paulie was beating up badly by a weight drain Cotto. Cotto broke Paulie cheek bone for goodness sake.

 

Hatton first
Cotto second
Khan third

Cotto is second because Paulie was way more hungry back then and it showed.

Khan did a great job though

 

Hatton didn't beat up Paulie the way Cotto and Khan did. And it was a bs stoppage cause Pauile wasn't hurt enough to be stopped. That is the reason why Buddy was fired because of it.

 

Yeah would have been a close one.

 

How is Cotto is last place on the poll?? He broke Paulie's eye socket! Smashed his face all up!